Geoffrey C. Bowker

Affiliations: 
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 
Area:
Social Structure and Development, Information Science, Computer Science
Google:
"Geoffrey Bowker"
BETA: Related publications

Publications

You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Ribes D, Hoffman AS, Slota SC, et al. (2019) The logic of domains. Social Studies of Science. 306312719849709
Millerand F, Ribes D, Baker KS, et al. (2013) Making an Issue out of a Standard: Storytelling Practices in a Scientific Community Science Technology and Human Values. 38: 7-43
Edwards PN, Mayernik MS, Batcheller AL, et al. (2011) Science friction: data, metadata, and collaboration. Social Studies of Science. 41: 667-90
Jackson SJ, Ribes D, Buyuktur A, et al. (2011) Collaborative rhythm : Temporal dissonance and alignment in collaborative scientific work Proceedings of the Acm Conference On Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Cscw. 245-254
Bowker GC. (2010) Reflections from geoffrey bowker Science Technology and Human Values. 35: 579-580
Ribes D, Bowker GC. (2009) Between meaning and machine: Learning to represent the knowledge of communities Information and Organization. 19: 199-217
Star SL, Bowker GC. (2007) Enacting silence: Residual categories as a challenge for ethics, information systems, and communication Ethics and Information Technology. 9: 273-280
Ribes D, Baker KS, Millerand F, et al. (2005) Comparative interoperability project: Configurations of community, technology, organization Proceedings of the Acm/Ieee Joint Conference On Digital Libraries. 65-66
Arzberger P, Schroeder P, Beaulieu A, et al. (2004) Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific, Economic, and Social Development Data Science Journal. 3: 135-152
Porac JF, Wade JB, Fischer HM, et al. (2004) Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: A comparative case study of two scientific teams Research Policy. 33: 661-678
See more...