Aubhik Khan
Affiliations: | Economics | Ohio State University, Columbus, Columbus, OH |
Area:
General Economics, Labor EconomicsGoogle:
"Aubhik Khan"Children
Sign in to add traineeLucas M Engelhardt | grad student | 2005-2010 | |
Aaron Popp | grad student | 2012 | Ohio State |
Takeki Sunakawa | grad student | 2012 | Ohio State |
Shuhei Takahashi | grad student | 2012 | Ohio State |
Tamon Takamura | grad student | 2012 | Ohio State |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Khan A. (2019) Comment on Long and Plosser meet Bewley and Lucas Journal of Monetary Economics. 102: 93-95 |
Khan A, Thomas JK. (2015) Revisiting the tale of two interest rates with endogenous asset market segmentation Review of Economic Dynamics. 18: 243-268 |
Khan A, Thomas JK. (2013) Credit shocks and aggregate fluctuations in an economy with production heterogeneity Journal of Political Economy. 121: 1055-1107 |
Khan A, Thomas JK. (2008) Idiosyncratic Shocks and the Role of Nonconvexities in Plant and Aggregate Investment Dynamics Econometrica. 76: 395-436 |
KHAN A, THOMAS JK. (2007) EXPLAINING INVENTORIES: A BUSINESS CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF THE STOCKOUT AVOIDANCE AND (S,s) MOTIVES Macroeconomic Dynamics. 11: 638-664 |
Khan A, Thomas JK. (2004) Modeling inventories over the business cycle Staff Report |
Khan A, Thomas JK. (2004) Inventories and the Business Cycle: An Equilibrium Analysis of (S,S) Policies The American Economic Review. 97: 1165-1188 |
Khan A, King RG, Wolman AL. (2003) Optimal Monetary Policy The Review of Economic Studies. 70: 825-860 |
Khan A, Thomas JK. (2003) Nonconvex factor adjustments in equilibrium business cycle models: do nonlinearities matter? Journal of Monetary Economics. 50: 331-360 |
Atkenson A, Khan A, Ohanian L. (1996) Are data on industry evolution and gross job turnover relevant for macroeconomics Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series On Public Policy. 44: 215-250 |