Shelby A. Wolf
Affiliations: | Education | University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States |
Area:
Curriculum and Instruction Education, Elementary EducationGoogle:
"Shelby Wolf"Children
Sign in to add traineeMonette C. McIver | grad student | 2001 | CU Boulder |
Leslie K. Maniotes | grad student | 2005 | CU Boulder |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Wolf SA. (2008) The mysteries of creative partnerships Journal of Teacher Education. 59: 89-102 |
Heath SB, Wolf S. (2005) Focus in creative learning: Drawing on art for language development Literacy. 39: 38-45 |
Borko H, Wolf SA, Simone G, et al. (2003) Schools in Transition: Reform Efforts and School Capacity in Washington State Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 25: 171-201 |
Wolf SA. (2001) ȁWax On/Wax Offȁ: Helping Preservice Teachers ȁReadȁ Themselves, Children, and Literature Theory Into Practice. 40: 205-211 |
Wolf SA, Borko H, Elliott RL, et al. (2000) "That dog won't hunt!": Exemplary school change efforts within the Kentucky reform American Educational Research Journal. 37: 349-393 |
Wolf SA, Ballentine D, Hill LA. (2000) "Only connect!": Cross-cultural connections in the reading lives of preservice teachers and children Journal of Literacy Research. 32: 533-569 |
Wolf SA. (1998) The flight of reading: Shifts in instruction, orchestration, and attitudes through classroom theatre Reading Research Quarterly. 33: 382-415 |
Gearhart M, Wolf SA. (1997) issues in Portfolio Assessment: Assessing Writing Processes From Their Products Educational Assessment. 4: 265-296 |
Wolf SA, Gearhart M. (1997) New writing assessments: The challenge of changing teachers' beliefs about students as writers Theory Into Practice. 36: 220-230 |
Wolf SA, Carey AA, Mieras EL. (1996) "What is this literachurch stuff anyway?": Preservice teachers' growth in understanding children's literary response Reading Research Quarterly. 31: 130-157 |