☰

Pamela S. Samuelson, Ph.D. - Publications

Affiliations: 
2003 Boston College, Newton, MA, United States 
Area:
Higher Education, Administration Education, Physical Education
Tree Info Similar researchers PubMed Report error

85 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2019 Samuelson P, Gergen MP. The Disgorgement Remedy of Design Patent Law California Law Review. 108: 183. DOI: 10.2139/Ssrn.3353536  0.315
2019 Samuelson P. Europe's controversial digital copyright directive finalized Communications of the Acm. 62: 24-27. DOI: 10.1145/3363179  0.335
2019 Samuelson P. API copyrights revisited Communications of the Acm. 62: 20-22. DOI: 10.1145/3332805  0.306
2019 Samuelson P. Questioning a new intellectual property right for press publishers Communications of the Acm. 62: 20-23. DOI: 10.1145/3306610  0.308
2018 Samuelson P. The EU's controversial digital single market directive Communications of the Acm. 61: 20-23. DOI: 10.1145/3277562  0.34
2017 Samuelson P, Hashimoto K. Scholarly Concerns About a Proposed Copyright Small Claims Tribunal Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 33: 689. DOI: 10.2139/Ssrn.3060796  0.396
2016 Samuelson P. Freedom to Tinker Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 17: 563. DOI: 10.1515/Til-2016-0021  0.404
2016 Samuelson P. Legally speaking: New exemptions to anti-circumvention rules Communications of the Acm. 59: 24-26. DOI: 10.1145/2879643  0.318
2015 Samuelson P. Functionality and Expression in Computer Programs: Refining the Tests for Software Copyright Infringement Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 31: 1215. DOI: 10.2139/Ssrn.2667740  0.367
2015 Samuelson P. Legally speaking: Software patents are falling down Communications of the Acm. 58: 27-29. DOI: 10.1145/2822511  0.323
2015 Samuelson P. Legally speaking anti-circumvention rules limit reverse engineering Communications of the Acm. 58: 24-26. DOI: 10.1145/2770890  0.3
2015 Samuelson P. Legally speaking copyrightability of Java APIs revisited Communications of the Acm. 58: 22-24. DOI: 10.1145/2723669  0.4
2014 Samuelson P. Updates on the intellectual property front Communications of the Acm. 57: 28-30. DOI: 10.1145/2668895  0.323
2014 Samuelson P. Watching TV on Internet-connected devices: The ABC vs. Aereo case has potentially far-reaching consequences Communications of the Acm. 57: 22-24. DOI: 10.1145/2618099  0.323
2014 Samuelson P. Legally speaking: Mass digitization as fair use Communications of the Acm. 57: 20-22. DOI: 10.1145/2566965  0.376
2013 Hansen DR, Hashimoto K, Hinze G, Samuelson P, Urban JM. Solving the Orphan Works Problem for the United States Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts. 37: 1-55. DOI: 10.7916/D8Pn93Mh  0.333
2013 Samuelson P. Is software patentable? Communications of the Acm. 56: 23-25. DOI: 10.1145/2527186  0.339
2013 Samuelson P. Legally speaking: A copyright challenge to resales of digital music Communications of the Acm. 56: 24-26. DOI: 10.1145/2428556.2428564  0.345
2012 Samuelson P. The Quest for a Sound Conception of Copyright's Derivative Work Right Georgetown Law Journal. 101: 1505-1564. DOI: 10.2139/Ssrn.2138479  0.352
2012 Samuelson P. Legally speaking: Oracle v. Google: Are APIs copyrightable? Communications of the Acm. 55: 25-27. DOI: 10.1145/2366316.2366325  0.346
2012 Samuelson P. Can online piracy be stopped by laws? Communications of the Acm. 55: 25-27. DOI: 10.1145/2209249.2209260  0.323
2012 Samuelson P. Do Software copyrights protect what programs Do? Communications of the Acm. 55: 27-29. DOI: 10.1145/2093548.2093559  0.349
2011 Samuelson P. Legislative Alternatives to the Google Book Settlement Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts. 34: 697-729. DOI: 10.7916/D8S472M3  0.361
2011 Samuelson P, Vinje TC, Cornish WR. Does Copyright Protection Under the EU Software Directive Extend to Computer Program Behaviour, Languages and Interfaces? European Intellectual Property Review. 34. DOI: 10.2139/Ssrn.1974890  0.333
2011 Samuelson P. Legally speaking: Why the google book settlement failed- and what comes next? Communications of the Acm. 54: 29-31. DOI: 10.1145/2018396.2018408  0.344
2011 Samuelson P. Legally speaking too many copyrights? Communications of the Acm. 54: 29-31. DOI: 10.1145/1965724.1965736  0.322
2011 Samuelson P. Legally speaking do you own the software you buy? Communications of the Acm. 54: 26-28. DOI: 10.1145/1897852.1897863  0.32
2010 Samuelson P. The Copyright Principles Project: Directions for Reform Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 25: 1175. DOI: 10.15779/Z38B12P  0.388
2010 Samuelson P. Legally speaking: Why do software startups patent (or not)? Communications of the Acm. 53: 30-32. DOI: 10.1145/1839676.1839687  0.312
2010 Samuelson P. Should the google book settlement be approved? Communications of the Acm. 53: 32-34. DOI: 10.1145/1785414.1785429  0.308
2010 Samuelson P. Only technological processes are patentable Communications of the Acm. 53: 25-27. DOI: 10.1145/1666420.1666432  0.307
2009 Graham SJH, Merges RP, Samuelson P, Sichelman TM. High Technology Entrepreneurs and the Patent System: Results of the 2008 Berkeley Patent Survey Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 24: 1255. DOI: 10.2139/Ssrn.1429049  0.322
2009 Samuelson P. Legally speaking: Are business methods patentable? Communications of the Acm. 52: 28-30. DOI: 10.1145/1592761.1592772  0.331
2009 Samuelson P. Legally speaking: When is a "license" really a sale? Communications of the Acm. 52: 27-29. DOI: 10.1145/1467247.1467258  0.326
2009 Samuelson P. Exasperated by Copyright Science. 326: 525-525. DOI: 10.1126/Science.1181807  0.349
2008 Samuelson P. Legally speaking quantafying the value of patent exhaustion Communications of the Acm. 51: 27-29. DOI: 10.1145/1400214.1400224  0.322
2008 Samuelson P. Hacking intellectual property law Communications of the Acm. 51: 65-67. DOI: 10.1145/1327452.1327482  0.307
2008 Samuelson P, Reichman JH, Dinwoodie G. How to achieve (some) balance in anti-circumvention laws Communications of the Acm. 51: 21-25. DOI: 10.1145/1314215.1314220  0.329
2007 Samuelson P. Preliminary Thoughts on Copyright Reform Utah Law Review. 2007: 551. DOI: 10.5072/Ulr.V2007I3.8  0.31
2007 Reichman JH, Dinwoodie GB, Samuelson P. A Reverse Notice and Takedown Regime to Enable Public Interest Uses of Technically Protected Copyrighted Works Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 22: 981. DOI: 10.15779/Z38639Z  0.43
2007 Samuelson P. Does copyright law need to be reformed? Communications of the Acm. 50: 19-23. DOI: 10.1145/1290958.1290981  0.39
2007 Samuelson P. Patent reform through the courts Communications of the Acm. 50: 19-23. DOI: 10.1145/1216016.1216038  0.326
2006 Samuelson P. Principles for Resolving Conflicts between Trade Secrets and the First Amendment Hastings Law Journal. 58: 777. DOI: 10.2139/Ssrn.925056  0.353
2006 Samuelson P. IBM's pragmatic embrace of open source Communications of the Acm. 49: 21-25. DOI: 10.1145/1164394.1164412  0.358
2006 Samuelson P. Copyrighting standards Communications of the Acm. 49: 27-31. DOI: 10.1145/1132469.1132491  0.319
2006 Samuelson P. Regulating technical design Communications of the Acm. 49: 25-30. DOI: 10.1145/1113034.1113057  0.322
2005 Samuelson P. Did MGM really win the Grokster case? Communications of the Acm. 48: 19-24. DOI: 10.1145/1089107.1089125  0.335
2005 Samuelson P. The Supreme Court revisits the Sony safe harbor Communications of the Acm. 48: 21-25. DOI: 10.1145/1064830.1064849  0.364
2005 Samuelson P. Legislative challenges to the sony safe harbor rule Communications of the Acm. 48: 27-31. DOI: 10.1145/1047671.1047698  0.36
2005 Samuelson P. Intellectual property arbitrage: How foreign rules can affect domestic protections International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime. 635-652. DOI: 10.1017/Cbo9780511494529.031  0.384
2004 Samuelson P. Why reform the U.S. patent system? Communications of the Acm. 47: 19-23. DOI: 10.1145/990680.990697  0.306
2004 Samuelson P. What's at Stake in MGM v. Grokster? Communications of the Acm. 47: 15-20. DOI: 10.1145/966389.966405  0.349
2003 Samuelson P. Unsolicited communications as trespass? Communications of the Acm. 46: 15-20. DOI: 10.1145/944217.944229  0.331
2003 Samuelson P. Trade secrets vs. free speech Communications of the Acm. 46: 19-23. DOI: 10.1145/777313.777329  0.337
2003 Samuelson P. The congressional corral Ieee Spectrum. 40: 33-35. DOI: 10.1109/Mspec.2003.1197476  0.311
2002 Samuelson P, Scotchmer S. The Law and Economics of Reverse Engineering Yale Law Journal. 111: 1575. DOI: 10.2307/797533  0.306
2001 Samuelson P. Anticircumvention rules: threat to science. Science (New York, N.Y.). 293: 2028-31. PMID 11557876 DOI: 10.1126/Science.1063764  0.337
2000 Samuelson P. Privacy as Intellectual Property Stanford Law Review. 52: 1125. DOI: 10.2307/1229511  0.35
1999 Samuelson P. A New Kind of Privacy? Regulating Uses of Personal Data in the Global Information Economy California Law Review. 87: 751. DOI: 10.2307/3481032  0.31
1999 Samuelson P. Intellectual Property and the Digital Economy: Why the Anti-Circumvention Regulations Need to Be Revised Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 14: 519. DOI: 10.15779/Z38S96V  0.415
1998 Samuelson P. Encoding the law into digital libraries Communications of the Acm. 41: 13-18. DOI: 10.1145/273035.273039  0.306
1996 Samuelson P. On authors' rights in cyberspace: Questioning the need for new international rules on authors' rights in cyberspace First Monday. 1. DOI: 10.5210/Fm.V1I4.489  0.37
1996 Samuelson P. The Quest for Enabling Metaphors for Law and Lawyering in the Information Age Michigan Law Review. 94: 2029-2057. DOI: 10.2307/1289983  0.309
1996 Samuelson P. Legal protection for database contents Communications of the Acm. 39: 17-23. DOI: 10.1145/240483.240486  0.303
1996 Samuelson P. Regulation of technologies to protect copyrighted works Communications of the Acm. 39: 17-24. DOI: 10.1145/233977.233980  0.301
1996 Davis R, Samuelson P, Kapor M, Reichman J. A new view of intellectual property and software Communications of the Acm. 39: 21-30. DOI: 10.1145/227234.227237  0.313
1995 Samuelson P. Software compatibility and the law Communications of the Acm. 38: 15-22. DOI: 10.1145/208344.208373  0.316
1995 Samuelson P. Copyright and digital libraries Communications of the Acm. 38: 15-21. DOI: 10.1145/205323.205324  0.33
1995 Samuelson P. Copyright's fair use doctrine and digital data Publishing Research Quarterly. 11: 27-39. DOI: 10.1007/Bf02680415  0.329
1994 Samuelson P. Copyright's fair use doctrine and digital data Communications of the Acm. 37: 21-27. DOI: 10.1145/175222.175233  0.32
1994 Samuelson P. The Originality Standard for Literary Works under U.S. Copyright Law American Journal of Comparative Law. 42: 393-417. DOI: 10.1093/Ajcl/42.Suppl1.393  0.335
1993 Samuelson P. Computer programs and copyright's fair use doctrine Communications of the Acm. 36: 19-25. DOI: 10.1145/162685.162693  0.308
1992 Samuelson P. Updating the copyright look and feel lawsuits Communications of the Acm. 35: 25-31. DOI: 10.1145/130994.131009  0.33
1991 Samuelson P. Computer Programs, User Interfaces, and Section 102(b) of the Copyright Act of 1976: A Critique of Lotus v. Paperback Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 6: 209. DOI: 10.15779/Z38837T  0.345
1991 Samuelson P. Digital media and the law Communications of the Acm. 34: 23-28. DOI: 10.1145/125223.125289  0.374
1991 Samuelson P. Legally speaking: First Amendment rights for information providers? Communications of the Acm. 34: 19-23. DOI: 10.1145/103701.103703  0.337
1991 Samuelson P. Legally speaking: is information property? Communications of the Acm. 34: 15-18. DOI: 10.1145/102868.102875  0.33
1990 Samuelson P. Legally speaking: how to interpret the Lotus decision (and how not to) Communications of the Acm. 33: 27-33. DOI: 10.1145/92755.92784  0.362
1990 Samuelson P. Legally speaking: should program algorithms be patented Communications of the Acm. 33: 23-27. DOI: 10.1145/79173.79175  0.348
1990 Samuelson P, Glushko RFJ. What the user interface field thinks of the software copyright “look and feel” lawsuits (and what the law ought to do about it) Acm Sigchi Bulletin. 22: 13-17. DOI: 10.1145/122475.122477  0.34
1990 Samuelson P. Reverse-Engineering Someone Eise’s Software: Is It Legal? Ieee Software. 7: 90-96. DOI: 10.1109/52.43054  0.317
1989 Samuelson P. Why the look and feel of software user interfaces should not be protected by copyright law Communications of the Acm. 32: 563-572. DOI: 10.1145/63485.63487  0.359
1988 Samuelson P. Is Copyright Law Steering the Right Course? Ieee Software. 5: 78-86. DOI: 10.1109/52.7945  0.349
1987 Samuelson P. Innovation and Competition: Conflicts Over Intellectual Property Rights in New Technologies Science, Technology, & Human Values. 12: 6-21. DOI: 10.1177/016224398701200102  0.35
1984 Samuelson P. CONTU revisited: the case against copyright protection for computer programs in machine-readable form. Duke Law Journal. 1984: 663-769. DOI: 10.2307/1372418  0.371
Show low-probability matches.