Anna C. Kaatz, Ph.D.
Affiliations: | 2012 | Clinical Investigation - MED | University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, WI |
Area:
Health Care Management, Gender Studies, Cognitive PsychologyGoogle:
"Anna Kaatz"Parents
Sign in to add mentor| Mary L. Carnes | grad student | 2012 | UW Madison | |
| (Quantitative Text Analysis of R01 Grant Reviews from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).) | ||||
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
|
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
| Biernat M, Carnes M, Filut A, et al. (2019) Gender, Race, and Grant Reviews: Translating and Responding to Research Feedback. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin. 46: 140-154 |
| Pier EL, Brauer M, Filut A, et al. (2018) Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |
| Devine PG, Forscher PS, Cox WTL, et al. (2017) A Gender Bias Habit-Breaking Intervention Led to Increased Hiring of Female Faculty in STEMM Departments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 73: 211-215 |
| Pier EL, Raclaw J, Kaatz A, et al. (2017) 'Your comments are meaner than your score': score calibration talk influences intra- and inter-panel variability during scientific grant peer review. Research Evaluation. 26: 1-14 |
| Kaatz A, Carnes M, Gutierrez B, et al. (2017) Fair Play: A Study of Scientific Workforce Trainers' Experience Playing an Educational Video Game about Racial Bias. Cbe Life Sciences Education. 16 |
| Sheridan J, Savoy JN, Kaatz A, et al. (2017) Write More Articles, Get More Grants: The Impact of Department Climate on Faculty Research Productivity. Journal of Women's Health (2002) |
| Magua W, Zhu X, Bhattacharya A, et al. (2017) Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques. Journal of Women's Health (2002) |
| Kaatz A, Lee YG, Potvien A, et al. (2016) Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference? Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges |
| Kaatz A, Datallo M, Regner C, et al. (2015) Patterns of Feedback on the Bridge to Independence: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of NIH Mentored Career Development Award Application Critiques. Journal of Women's Health (2002) |
| Carnes M, Devine PG, Baier Manwell L, et al. (2015) The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 90: 221-30 |