Susan Haack
Affiliations: | University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL |
Area:
PhilosophyGoogle:
"Susan Haack"Parents
Sign in to add mentorIan Hacking | grad student | Cambridge | ||
(Per Acknowledgements in "Deviant Logic") | ||||
Timothy Smiley | grad student | Cambridge |
Children
Sign in to add traineeLuciano Floridi | grad student | Warwick University | |
Mark Migotti | grad student | 1985 | Warwick University |
Robert Edwin Lane | grad student | 1992-1998 | University of Miami |
Jason Borenstein | grad student | 2001 | University of Miami |
Rosa-Maria P. Mayorga | grad student | 2002 | University of Miami |
Kiriake Xerohemona | grad student | 2004 | University of Miami |
Hsi-Heng Cheng | grad student | 2005 | University of Miami |
Meggan R. Payne | grad student | 2010 | University of Miami |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Haack S. (2020) The Real Question: Can Philosophy Be Saved? Sats. 20: 89-95 |
Haack S. (2020) The world and how we know it: stumbling towards an understanding Journal of Critical Realism. 19: 78-88 |
Haack S. (2019) Post “Post‐Truth”: Are We There Yet? Theoria. 85: 258-275 |
Haack S. (2014) Do not block the way of inquiry Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society. 50: 319-339 |
Haack S. (2013) A Match Made on Earth: Getting Real About Science and the Law The Dalhousie Law Journal. 36: 39 |
Haack S. (2012) The Embedded Epistemologist: Dispatches from the Legal Front Ratio Juris. 25: 206-235 |
Haack S. (2011) Pragmatism, Law, and Morality. The Lessons of Buck v. Bell European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy |
Haack S. (2011) Double-aspect foundherentism: A new theory of empirical justification The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. 407-422 |
Haack S. (2010) Belief in Naturalism: An Epistemologist's Philosophy of Mind Logos and Episteme. 1: 67-83 |
Haack S. (2009) Irreconcilable differences? The troubled marriage of science and law Law and Contemporary Problems. 72: 1-23 |