Robert C. Koons
Affiliations: | Germanic Studies | University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, U.S.A. |
Area:
metaphysics, philosophical logic, and philosophy of natureGoogle:
"Robert Koons"Children
Sign in to add traineeNora Berenstain | grad student | University of Tennessee at Knoxville | |
Jayson S. Galler | grad student | UT Austin (Theology Tree) | |
Nicholas Mantegani | grad student | UT Austin (SPRtree) | |
David Vincent Newman | grad student | ||
Neal D. Judisch | grad student | 2005 | UT Austin (Theology Tree) |
Maxwell J. Goss | grad student | 2006 | UT Austin (Theology Tree) |
Timothy H. Pickavance | grad student | 2008 | UT Austin (Theology Tree) |
Emilie Pagano | grad student | 2019-2022 | UT Austin |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Koons RC, Pruss AR. (2020) Skepticism and the principle of sufficient reason Philosophical Studies. 1-21 |
Koons RC. (2017) The ontological and epistemological superiority of hylomorphism Synthese. 1-19 |
Koons R. (2013) Molinism: The Contemporary Debate, edited by Ken Perszyk Faith and Philosophy. 30: 345-353 |
O'Brien MB, Koons RC. (2012) Objects of intention: A hylomorphic critique of the new natural law theory American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly. 86: 655-703 |
Liao B, Jin L, Koons RC. (2011) Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method Artificial Intelligence. 175: 1790-1814 |
Koons RC. (2006) Logic and Theism: Arguments For and Against Beliefs in God Faith and Philosophy. 23: 356-360 |
Koons RC. (2006) Bob and carol and tess and ali Sophia. 45: 117-122 |
Koons RC. (2004) The Logic of Causal Explanation An Axiomatization Studia Logica. 77: 325-354 |
Koons RC. (2001) Defeasible reasoning, special pleading and the cosmological argument: A reply to Oppy Faith and Philosophy. 18: 192-203 |
Koons RC. (1999) Situation Mereology and the Logic of Causation Topoi-An International Review of Philosophy. 18: 167-174 |