Justin H. Kirkland, Ph.D.
Affiliations: | 2012 | Political Science: Doctoral | University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC |
Area:
GeneralGoogle:
"Justin Kirkland"Parents
Sign in to add mentor| Thomas Carsey | grad student | 2012 | UNC Chapel Hill | |
| (The Relational Nature of Legislating.) | ||||
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
|
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
| Kong AY, Robichaud MO, Ribisl KM, et al. (2020) Characteristics of proposed and enacted state tobacco control legislation in the United States, 2010-2015. Journal of Public Health Policy |
| Burke R, Kirkland JH, Slapin JB. (2020) Party Competition, Personal Votes, and Strategic Disloyalty in the U.S. States: Political Research Quarterly. 106591292095321 |
| Simas EN, Clifford S, Kirkland JH. (2020) How Empathic Concern Fuels Political Polarization American Political Science Review. 114: 258-269 |
| Kirkland JH, Banda KK. (2019) Perceived Ideological Distance and Trust in Congress Social Science Quarterly. 100: 1810-1827 |
| Clifford S, Kirkland JH, Simas EN. (2019) How Dispositional Empathy Influences Political Ambition The Journal of Politics. 81: 1043-1056 |
| McBrayer M, Shea PE, Kirkland JH. (2018) The Financial Crisis, Fiscal Federalism, and the Creditworthiness of US State Governments Statistics, Politics, and Policy. 9: 1-30 |
| Banda KK, Kirkland JH. (2017) Legislative Party Polarization and Trust in State Legislatures American Politics Research. 46: 596-628 |
| Kirkland JH, Kroeger MA. (2017) Companion Bills and Cross-Chamber Collaboration in the U.S. Congress American Politics Research. 46: 629-670 |
| Slapin JB, Kirkland JH, Lazzaro JA, et al. (2017) Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament American Political Science Review. 112: 15-30 |
| Kirkland JH, Slapin JB. (2017) Ideology and strategic party disloyalty in the US house of representatives Electoral Studies. 49: 26-37 |