Shannon Jenkins, Ph.D.
Affiliations: | 2003 | Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States |
Area:
GeneralGoogle:
"Shannon Jenkins"Parents
Sign in to add mentorJohn Frendreis | grad student | 2003 | Loyola University Chicago | |
(The context of legislative choice: Variations in the relative importance of roll call voting explanations.) |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Jenkins S, Roscoe DD. (2014) Parties as the political safeguards of federalism: The impact of local political party activity on national elections Publius. 44: 519-540 |
Jenkins S. (2014) Local Elections and the Politics of Small-Scale Democracy . By Oliver J. Eric with Ha Shang E. and Callen Zachary. (Princeton University Press, 2012.) The Journal of Politics. 76 |
Jenkins S. (2012) How Gender Influences Roll Call Voting Social Science Quarterly. 93: 415-433 |
Jenkins S. (2011) The Influence of Interest Groups on State Legislative Behavior American Review of Politics. 32: 233-258 |
Jenkins S. (2010) Examining the Influences over Roll Call Voting in Multiple Issue Areas: A Comparative US State Analysis The Journal of Legislative Studies. 16: 14-31 |
Jenkins S. (2008) Party Influence on Roll Call Voting: A View from the U.S. States State Politics & Policy Quarterly. 8: 239-262 |
Jenkins S. (2007) 101 Chambers: Congress, State Legislatures and the Future of Legislative Studies – By Peverill Squire and Keith E. Hamm The Journal of Politics. 69: 275-276 |
Jenkins S. (2006) The Impact of Party and Ideology on Roll Call Voting in State Legislatures Legislative Studies Quarterly. 31: 235-257 |
Roscoe DD, Jenkins S, Frendreis J, et al. (2006) Thinking Outside the Quality Box: The Impact of Candidate Motivations on Election Outcomes American Review of Politics. 27: 21-43 |
Roscoe DD, Jenkins S. (2005) A meta-analysis of campaign contributions' impact on roll call voting Social Science Quarterly. 86: 52-68 |