Eric S. Knowles

Affiliations: 
University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR 
Area:
social, personality
Google:
"Eric Knowles"
BETA: Related publications

Publications

You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Smith SR, Hilsenroth MJ, Baity MR, et al. (2003) Assessment of patient and therapist perspectives of process: a revision of the Vanderbilt Psychotherapy Process Scale. American Journal of Psychotherapy. 57: 195-205
Smith SR, Baity MR, Knowles ES, et al. (2001) Assessment of disordered thinking in children and adolescents: the rorschach perceptual-thinking index. Journal of Personality Assessment. 77: 447-63
Knowles ES, Condon CA. (2000) Does the rose still smell as sweet? Item variability across test forms and revisions. Psychological Assessment. 12: 245-52
Knowles ES, Condon CA. (1999) Why people say "yes": A dual-process theory of acquiescence Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 77: 379-386
Knowles ES, Nathan KT. (1997) Acquiescent Responding in Self-Reports: Cognitive Style or Social Concern? Journal of Research in Personality. 31: 293-301
Knowles ES, Coker MC, Scott RA, et al. (1996) Measurement-induced improvement in anxiety: mean shifts with repeated assessment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 71: 352-63
Knowles ES, Byers B. (1996) Reliability shifts in measurement reactivity: driven by content engagement or self-engagement? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 70: 1080-90
Knowles ES, Sibicky ME. (1990) Continuity and Diversity in the Stream of Selves Metaphorical Resolutions of William James's One-in-Many-Selves Paradox Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 16: 676-687
Bissonnette V, Ickes W, Bernstein I, et al. (1990) Item Variances and Median Splits: Some Discouraging and Disquieting Findings Journal of Personality. 58: 595-601
Knowles ES. (1988) Item Context Effects on Personality Scales: Measuring Changes the Measure Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 55: 312-320
See more...