Richard Shull, Ph.D.

Affiliations: 
Psychology Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States 
Area:
Operant conditioning
Google:
"Richard Shull"
BETA: Related publications

Publications

You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Smith TT, McLean AP, Shull RL, et al. (2014) Concurrent performance as bouts of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 102: 102-25
Shull RL, Grimes JA, Bennett JA. (2004) Bouts of responding: the relation between bout rate and the rate of variable-interval reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 81: 65-83
Shull RL, Gaynor ST, Grimes JA. (2001) Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: effects of relative reinforcement and schedule type. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 75: 247-74
Nevin JA, Tota ME, Torquato RD, et al. (1990) Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 53: 359-79
Brownstein AJ, Shull RL. (1987) Toward a Systematic Approach to the Study of Complex Human Functioning The Psychological Record. 37: 35-35
Buskist W, Dietz SM, Etzel B, et al. (1987) The Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior: History, Current Status, and Future Directions The Psychological Record. 37: 3-3
Buskist W, Dietz SM, Etzel B, et al. (1987) The Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior: History, Current Status, and Future Directions The Psychological Record. 37: 3-3
Brownstein AJ, Shull RL. (1985) A rule for the use of the term, "Rule-governed behavior". The Behavior Analyst / Maba. 8: 265-7
Brownstein AJ, Shull RL. (1983) The Analysis of Complex Cases: A Review of Schwartz and Lacey’s Behaviorism, Science, and Human Nature The Behavior Analyst. 6: 77-91
Capehart GW, Eckerman DA, Guilkey M, et al. (1980) A comparison of ratio and interval reinforcement schedules with comparable interreinforcement times. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 34: 61-76
See more...