☰

Darren Burke - Publications

Affiliations: 
School of Psychology University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom 
Area:
Evolution, vision, face perception
Tree Info Grants Similar researchers PubMed Report error

44 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2023 Sulikowski D, Favelle S, McKone E, Willis M, Burke D. The composite effect reveals that human (but not other primate) faces are special to humans. Plos One. 18: e0286451. PMID 37252925 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286451  0.709
2020 Marshall P, Bartolacci A, Burke D. Human Face Tilt Is a Dynamic Social Signal That Affects Perceptions of Dimorphism, Attractiveness, and Dominance. Evolutionary Psychology : An International Journal of Evolutionary Approaches to Psychology and Behavior. 18: 1474704920910403. PMID 32124644 DOI: 10.1177/1474704920910403  0.399
2017 Woo KL, Rieucau G, Burke D. Computer-animated stimuli to measure motion sensitivity: constraints on signal design in the Jacky dragon. Current Zoology. 63: 75-84. PMID 29491965 DOI: 10.1093/cz/zow074  0.387
2016 Russell F, Burke D. Conditional same/different concept learning in the short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 105: 133-54. PMID 26781053 DOI: 10.1002/jeab.185  0.369
2015 Favelle S, Tobin A, Piepers D, Burke D, Robbins RA. Dynamic composite faces are processed holistically. Vision Research. 112: 26-32. PMID 25982714 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2015.05.002  0.734
2015 Favelle S, Tobin A, Piepers D, Burke D, Robbins RA. Dynamic composite faces are processed holistically Vision Research. 112: 26-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.05.002  0.685
2013 Bennetts RJ, Kim J, Burke D, Brooks KR, Lucey S, Saragih J, Robbins RA. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli. Perception. 42: 950-70. PMID 24386715 DOI: 10.1068/P7446  0.4
2013 Burke D, Nolan C, Hayward WG, Russell R, Sulikowski D. Is there an own-race preference in attractiveness? Evolutionary Psychology : An International Journal of Evolutionary Approaches to Psychology and Behavior. 11: 855-72. PMID 23948346 DOI: 10.1177/147470491301100410  0.307
2013 Burke D, Sulikowski D. The evolution of holistic processing of faces. Frontiers in Psychology. 4: 11. PMID 23382721 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00011  0.376
2012 Bennetts R, Burke D, Brooks K, Kim J, Lucey S, Saragih J, Robbins R. Movement helps famous and unfamiliar face matching: Evidence from a sorting task Journal of Vision. 12: 981-981. DOI: 10.1167/12.9.981  0.305
2012 Sulikowski D, Burke D. Win shifting in nectarivorous birds: Selective inhibition of the learned win-stay response Animal Behaviour. 83: 519-524. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.11.030  0.322
2011 Willis ML, Palermo R, Burke D. Judging approachability on the face of it: the influence of face and body expressions on the perception of approachability. Emotion (Washington, D.C.). 11: 514-23. PMID 21668104 DOI: 10.1037/a0022571  0.306
2011 Sulikowski D, Burke D. Win-shift and win-stay learning in the rainbow lorikeet (Trichoglossus haematodus). Journal of Comparative Psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983). 125: 143-9. PMID 21604850 DOI: 10.1037/a0023249  0.341
2011 Willis ML, Palermo R, Burke D. Social judgments are influenced by both facial expression and direction of eye gaze Social Cognition. 29: 415-429. DOI: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.4.415  0.301
2011 Sulikowski D, Burke D. Movement and memory: Different cognitive strategies are used to search for resources with different natural distributions Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 65: 621-631. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-010-1063-4  0.303
2010 Burke D, Sulikowski D. A new viewpoint on the evolution of sexually dimorphic human faces. Evolutionary Psychology : An International Journal of Evolutionary Approaches to Psychology and Behavior. 8: 573-85. PMID 22947821 DOI: 10.1177/147470491000800404  0.309
2010 Willis ML, Palermo R, Burke D, Atkinson CM, McArthur G. Switching associations between facial identity and emotional expression: a behavioural and ERP study. Neuroimage. 50: 329-39. PMID 19962443 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.071  0.344
2010 Taubert J, Burke D, Favelle S, McKone E. Navigating the boundary of face space: What kind of stimulus is a face? Journal of Vision. 7: 889-889. DOI: 10.1167/7.9.889  0.703
2010 Sulikowski D, Burke D. When a place is not a place: Encoding of spatial information is dependent on reward type Behaviour. 147: 1461-1479. DOI: 10.1163/000579510X521564  0.321
2009 Campbell J, Burke D. Evidence that identity-dependent and identity-independent neural populations are recruited in the perception of five basic emotional facial expressions. Vision Research. 49: 1532-40. PMID 19303422 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.009  0.36
2009 Woo KL, Burke D, Peters RA. Motion sensitivity of the Jacky dragon, Amphibolurus muricatus: random-dot kinematograms reveal the importance of motion noise for signal detection Animal Behaviour. 77: 307-315. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.10.011  0.31
2008 Tomiczek C, Burke D. Is implicit learning perceptually inflexible? New evidence using a simple cued reaction-time task Learning and Motivation. 39: 95-113. DOI: 10.1016/J.Lmot.2007.07.001  0.742
2007 Favelle SK, Burke D. Attention to configural information in change detection for faces. Perception. 36: 1353-67. PMID 18196701 DOI: 10.1068/p5517  0.723
2007 Burke D, Taubert J, Higman T. Are face representations viewpoint dependent? A stereo advantage for generalizing across different views of faces. Vision Research. 47: 2164-9. PMID 17572467 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.04.018  0.382
2006 Favelle SK, Hayward WG, Burke D, Palmisano S. The configural advantage in object change detection persists across depth rotation. Perception & Psychophysics. 68: 1254-63. PMID 17378412 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03193725  0.749
2006 Wenderoth P, Burke D. Testing the tilt-constancy theory of visual illusions. Perception. 35: 201-13. PMID 16583766 DOI: 10.1068/p5388  0.603
2006 Favelle S, Palmisano S, Burke D, Hayward WG. The role of attention in processing configural and shape information in 3-D novel objects Visual Cognition. 13: 623-642. DOI: 10.1080/13506280544000228  0.759
2005 Burke D. Combining disparate views of objects: Viewpoint costs are reduced by stereopsis Visual Cognition. 12: 705-719. DOI: 10.1080/13506280444000463  0.336
2003 Palmisano S, Burke D, Allison RS. Coherent perspective jitter induces visual illusions of self-motion. Perception. 32: 97-110. PMID 12613789 DOI: 10.1068/p3468  0.571
2003 Keane SK, Hayward WG, Burke D. Detection of three types of changes to novel objects Visual Cognition. 10: 101-127. DOI: 10.1080/713756672  0.366
2003 Burke D, Fulham BJ. An evolved spatial memory bias in a nectar-feeding bird? Animal Behaviour. 66: 695-701. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2246  0.338
2002 Burke D, Cieplucha C, Cass J, Russell F, Fry G. Win-shift and win-stay learning in the short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus). Animal Cognition. 5: 79-84. PMID 12150039 DOI: 10.1007/S10071-002-0131-1  0.711
2002 Burke D, Hayward WG. Two visual systems but only one theory of perception Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 25: 100. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X02250025  0.389
2001 Burke D, Everingham P, Rogers T, Hinton M, Hall-Aspland S. Perceptual grouping in two visually reliant species: Humans (Homo sapiens) and Australian sea lions (Neophoca cinerea) Perception. 30: 1093-1106. PMID 11694085 DOI: 10.1068/p3239  0.336
2000 Burke D, Roodenrys S. Implicit Learning in a Simple Cued Reaction-Time Task Learning and Motivation. 31: 364-380. DOI: 10.1006/lmot.2000.1062  0.317
1999 Burke D, Alais D, Wenderoth P. Determinants of fusion of dichoptically presented orthogonal gratings. Perception. 28: 73-88. PMID 10627854 DOI: 10.1068/P2694  0.672
1997 Alais D, Wenderoth P, Burke D. The size and number of plaid blobs mediate the misperception of type-II plaid direction. Vision Research. 37: 143-50. PMID 9068836 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00320-7  0.7
1996 Alais D, Burke D, Wenderoth P. Further evidence for monocular determinants of perceived plaid direction. Vision Research. 36: 1247-53. PMID 8711904 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00194-8  0.704
1994 Burke D, Alais D, Wenderoth P. A role for a low level mechanism in determining plaid coherence. Vision Research. 34: 3189-96. PMID 7975350 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90083-3  0.688
1994 Alais D, Wenderoth P, Burke D. The contribution of one-dimensional motion mechanisms to the perceived direction of drifting plaids and their after effects. Vision Research. 34: 1823-34. PMID 7941385 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90307-7  0.702
1994 Wenderoth P, Alais D, Burke D, van der Zwan R. The role of the blobs in determining the perception of drifting plaids and their motion aftereffects. Perception. 23: 1163-9. PMID 7899031 DOI: 10.1068/P231163  0.766
1993 Burke D, Wenderoth P. Determinants of two-dimensional motion aftereffects induced by simultaneously- and alternately-presented plaid components. Vision Research. 33: 351-9. PMID 8447107 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90091-A  0.624
1993 Burke D, Wenderoth P. The effect of interactions between one-dimensional component gratings on two-dimensional motion perception. Vision Research. 33: 343-50. PMID 8447106 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90090-J  0.595
1989 Burke D, Wenderoth P. Cyclopean tilt aftereffects can be induced monocularly: is there a purely binocular process? Perception. 18: 471-82. PMID 2813023 DOI: 10.1068/P180471  0.62
Show low-probability matches.