Mark C. Paulk, Ph.D.
Affiliations: | 2005 | University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States |
Area:
Industrial Engineering, Computer ScienceGoogle:
"Mark Paulk"Parents
Sign in to add mentorMainak Mazumdar | grad student | 2005 | University of Pittsburgh | |
(An empirical study of process discipline and software quality.) |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Garzás J, Paulk MC. (2013) A case study of software process improvement with CMMI-DEV and Scrum in Spanish companies Journal of Software: Evolution and Process. 25: 1325-1333 |
Ferreira AL, Machado RJ, Paulk MC. (2011) An approach to software process design and implementation using transition rules Proceedings - 37th Euromicro Conference On Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, Seaa 2011. 330-333 |
Ferreira AL, Machado RJ, Paulk MC. (2011) Supporting audits and assessments in multi-model environments Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 6759: 73-87 |
Ferreira AL, MacHado RJ, Silva JG, et al. (2010) An apporach to improving software inspections performance Ieee International Conference On Software Maintenance, Icsm |
Kemerer CF, Paulk MC. (2009) The impact of design and code reviews on software quality: An empirical study based on PSP data Ieee Transactions On Software Engineering. 35: 534-550 |
Paulk MC. (2006) Factors affecting personal software quality Crosstalk. 19: 9-13 |
Paulk MC. (2001) Extreme programming from a CMM perspective Ieee Software. 18: 19-26 |
Paulk MC. (1998) Software Process Appraisal and Improvement: Models and Standards Advances in Computers. 46: 1-33 |
Herbsleb J, Zubrow D, Goldenson D, et al. (1997) Software quality and the Capability Maturity Model Communications of the Acm. 40: 30-40 |
Konrad M, Chrissis MB, Ferguson J, et al. (1996) Capability Maturity ModelingSM at the SEI Software Process: Improvement and Practice. 2: 21-34 |