Year |
Citation |
Score |
2018 |
Leventhal BC, Stone CA. Bayesian Analysis of Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models: A Discussion and Illustration of Three Response Style Models. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective. 16: 114-128. DOI: 10.1080/15366367.2018.1437306 |
0.357 |
|
2016 |
Stone C, Leventhal B. Accounting for Multidimensionality in Item Responses in Patient-Centered and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement The International Journal of Person-Centered Medicine. 6. DOI: 10.5750/Ijpcm.V6I4.614 |
0.39 |
|
2013 |
Stone CA, Tang Y. Comparing propensity score methods in balancing covariates and recovering impact in small sample educational program evaluations Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. 18. DOI: 10.7275/Qkqa-9K50 |
0.347 |
|
2012 |
Zhu X, Stone CA. Bayesian Comparison of Alternative Graded Response Models for Performance Assessment Applications Educational and Psychological Measurement. 72: 774-799. DOI: 10.1177/0013164411434638 |
0.544 |
|
2012 |
Xu T, Stone CA. Using IRT Trait Estimates Versus Summated Scores in Predicting Outcomes Educational and Psychological Measurement. 72: 453-468. DOI: 10.1177/0013164411419846 |
0.39 |
|
2011 |
Zhu X, Stone CA. Assessing fit of unidimensional graded response models using bayesian methods Journal of Educational Measurement. 48: 81-97. DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3984.2011.00132.X |
0.554 |
|
2010 |
Stone CA, Ye F, Zhu X, Lane S. A 32-providing subscale scores for diagnostic information: A case study when the test is essentially unidimensional Applied Measurement in Education. 23: 63-86. DOI: 10.1080/08957340903423651 |
0.531 |
|
2008 |
Zhang B, Stone CA. Evaluating item fit for multidimensional item response models Educational and Psychological Measurement. 68: 181-196. DOI: 10.1177/0013164407301547 |
0.381 |
|
2006 |
Stone CA, Yeh CC. Assessing the dimensionality and factor structure of multiple-choice exams: An empirical comparison of methods using the Multistate Bar Examination Educational and Psychological Measurement. 66: 193-214. DOI: 10.1177/0013164405282483 |
0.335 |
|
2005 |
Stone CA, Weissman A, Lane S. The consistency of student proficiency classifications under competing IRT models Educational Assessment. 10: 125-146. DOI: 10.1207/S15326977Ea1002_3 |
0.358 |
|
2005 |
Lane S, Stone CA. Strategies for Examining the Consequences of Assessment and Accountability Programs Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 21: 23-30. DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3992.2002.Tb00082.X |
0.35 |
|
2005 |
Lane S, Parke CS, Stone CA. A Framework for Evaluating the Consequences Programs of Assessment Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 17: 24-28. DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1998.Tb00830.X |
0.304 |
|
2004 |
Stone CA. IRTFIT_RESAMPLE: A Computer Program for Assessing Goodness of Fit of Item Response Theory Models Based on Posterior Expectations Applied Psychological Measurement. 28: 143-144. DOI: 10.1177/0146621603261380 |
0.362 |
|
2003 |
Stone CA, Lane S. Consequences of a state accountability program: Examining relationships between school performance gains and teacher, student, and school variables Applied Measurement in Education. 16: 1-26. DOI: 10.1207/S15324818Ame1601_1 |
0.325 |
|
2003 |
Stone CA. Empirical power and type I error rates for an IRT fit statistic that considers the precision of ability estimates Educational and Psychological Measurement. 63: 566-583. DOI: 10.1177/0013164402251034 |
0.394 |
|
2003 |
Stone CA, Zhang B. Assessing Goodness of Fit of Item Response Theory Models: A Comparison of Traditional and Alternative Procedures Journal of Educational Measurement. 40: 331-352. DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3984.2003.Tb01150.X |
0.393 |
|
2001 |
Stone CA, Davidson LJ, Evans JL, Hansen MA. Validity evidence for using a general critical thinking test to measure nursing students' critical thinking. Holistic Nursing Practice. 15: 65-74. PMID 12120497 DOI: 10.1097/00004650-200107000-00010 |
0.32 |
|
2000 |
Stone CA, Hansen MA. The effect of errors in estimating ability on goodness-of-fit tests for IRT models Educational and Psychological Measurement. 60: 974-991. DOI: 10.1177/00131640021970907 |
0.368 |
|
2000 |
Stone CA. Monte Carlo based null distribution for an alternative goodness-of-fit test statistic in IRT models Journal of Educational Measurement. 37: 58-75. DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3984.2000.Tb01076.X |
0.372 |
|
1996 |
Lane S, Liu M, Ankenmann RD, Stone CA. Generalizability and validity of a mathematics performance assessment Journal of Educational Measurement. 33: 71-92. DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3984.1996.Tb00480.X |
0.373 |
|
1995 |
Lane S, Stone CA, Ankenmann RD, Liu M. Examination of the Assumptions and Properties of the Graded Item Response Model: An Example Using a Mathematics Performance Assessment Applied Measurement in Education. 8: 313-340. DOI: 10.1207/S15324818Ame0804_3 |
0.395 |
|
1994 |
Lane S, Stone CA, Ankenmann RD, Liu M. Reliability and validity of a mathematics performance assessment International Journal of Educational Research. 21: 247-266. DOI: 10.1016/S0883-0355(06)80018-2 |
0.368 |
|
1992 |
Stone CA. Recovery of Marginal Maximum Likelihood Estimates in the Two-Parameter Logistic Response Model: An Evaluation of MULTILOG Applied Psychological Measurement. 16: 1-16. DOI: 10.1177/014662169201600101 |
0.323 |
|
1991 |
Stone CA, Lane S. Use of Restricted Item Response Theory Models for Examining the Stability of Item Parameter Estimates Over Time Applied Measurement in Education. 4: 125-141. DOI: 10.1207/S15324818Ame0402_3 |
0.37 |
|
1990 |
Stone CA, Sobel ME. The robustness of estimates of total indirect effects in covariance structure models estimated by maximum Psychometrika. 55: 337-352. DOI: 10.1007/Bf02295291 |
0.343 |
|
1985 |
Stone CA. Cindese: Computing Indirect Effects and Standard Errors in the Jöreskog Covariance Structure Model: Educational and Psychological Measurement. 45: 601-606. DOI: 10.1177/001316448504500315 |
0.331 |
|
1985 |
Bergan JR, Stone CA. Latent Class Models for Knowledge Domains Psychological Bulletin. 98: 166-184. DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.98.1.166 |
0.317 |
|
Show low-probability matches. |