Ryan Oprea, PhD
Affiliations: | Economics | University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States |
Area:
Experimental economics, economic dynamics, behavioral economics, experimetrics, applied theoryWebsite:
http://www.ryanoprea.com/Google:
"Ryan Oprea"Parents
Sign in to add mentorVernon L. Smith | grad student | 2006 | George Mason | |
(Experimental studies on survival in markets.) |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Kendall C, Oprea R. (2018) Are biased beliefs fit to survive? An experimental test of the market selection hypothesis Journal of Economic Theory. 176: 342-371 |
Huck S, Leutgeb J, Oprea R. (2017) Payoff information hampers the evolution of cooperation. Nature Communications. 8: 15147 |
Calford E, Oprea R. (2017) Continuity, Inertia, and Strategic Uncertainty: A Test of the Theory of Continuous Time Games Econometrica. 85: 915-935 |
Oprea R. (2014) Survival versus Profit Maximization in a Dynamic Stochastic Experiment Econometrica. 82: 2225-2255 |
Friedman D, Huck S, Oprea R, et al. (2014) From imitation to collusion: Long-run learning in a low-information environment Journal of Economic Theory. 155: 185-205 |
Oprea R, Charness G, Friedman D. (2014) Continuous time and communication in a public-goods experiment Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 108: 212-223 |
Oprea R, Wilson BJ, Zillante A. (2013) War of attrition: Evidence from a laboratory experiment on market exit Economic Inquiry. 51: 2018-2027 |
Crockett S, Oprea R, Plott C. (2011) Extreme Walrasian dynamics: The Gale example in the lab American Economic Review. 101: 3196-3220 |
Oprea R, Henwood K, Friedman D. (2011) Separating the Hawks from the Doves: Evidence from continuous time laboratory games Journal of Economic Theory. 146: 2206-2225 |
Anderson ST, Friedman D, Oprea R. (2010) Preemption games: Theory and experiment American Economic Review. 100: 1778-1803 |