Stuart Mestelman
Affiliations: | McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada |
Area:
FinanceGoogle:
"Stuart Mestelman"
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Buckley NJ, Cameron D, Cuff K, et al. (2018) A Behavioral Economic Study of Tax Rate Selection by the Median Voter: Can the Tax Rate Be Influenced by the Name of the Publicly Provided Private Good? Theoretical Economics Letters. 8: 485-501 |
Gomaa MI, Mestelman S, Nainar SMK, et al. (2017) Endogenous versus Exogenous Fairness Indices in Repeated Ultimatum Games Theoretical Economics Letters. 7: 1568-1594 |
Gomaa MI, Mestelman S, Nainar SMK, et al. (2016) Fairness in an Ultimatum Game Theoretical Economics Letters. 6: 186-194 |
Buckley N, Cuff K, Hurley J, et al. (2016) Should I stay or should I go? Exit options within mixed systems of public and private health care finance Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 131: 62-77 |
Mestelman S, Mohammad E, Shehata M. (2015) The Convergence of IFRS and U.S. GAAP: Evidence from the SEC's Removal of Form 20-F Reconciliations Accounting Perspectives. 14: 190-211 |
Buckley N, Cuff K, Hurley J, et al. (2015) Support for public provision of a private good with top-up and opt-out: A controlled laboratory experiment Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 111: 177-196 |
Gomaa M, Kanagaretnam K, Mestelman S, et al. (2015) Exercising empowerment in an investment environment Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance. 7: 33-41 |
Kanagaretnam K, Mestelman S, Nainar SMK, et al. (2014) Transparency and empowerment in an investment environment Journal of Business Research. 67: 2030-2038 |
Mentzakis E, Mestelman S. (2013) Hypothetical bias in value orientations ring games Economics Letters. 120: 562-565 |
Cuff K, Hurley J, Mestelman S, et al. (2012) Public and private health-care financing with alternate public rationing rules. Health Economics. 21: 83-100 |