Neal Kingston

Affiliations: 
Psychology & Research in Education University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States 
Area:
Tests and Measurements Education
Google:
"Neal Kingston"
BETA: Related publications

Publications

You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Wang W, Kingston N. (2020) Using Bayesian Nonparametric Item Response Function Estimation to Check Parametric Model Fit. Applied Psychological Measurement. 44: 331-345
Wang W, Kingston N. (2019) Adaptive Testing With a Hierarchical Item Response Theory Model. Applied Psychological Measurement. 43: 51-67
Atalmis EH, Kingston NM. (2018) The Impact of Homogeneity of Answer Choices on Item Difficulty and Discrimination Sage Open. 8: 215824401875814
Atalmış E, Kingston N. (2017) Three, four, and none of the above options in multiple-choice items Turkish Journal of Education. 6: 143-157
Clark AK, Nash B, Karvonen M, et al. (2017) Condensed Mastery Profile Method for Setting Standards for Diagnostic Assessment Systems Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 36: 5-15
Cho Hj, Kingston N. (2015) Examining Teachers’ Decisions on Test-Type Assignment for Statewide Assessments Journal of Special Education. 49: 16-27
Zheng C, Gaumer Erickson A, Kingston NM, et al. (2014) The relationship among self-determination, self-concept, and academic achievement for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 47: 462-74
Cho HJ, Kingston N. (2014) Understanding test-type assignment: Why do special educators make unexpected test-type assignments? Psychology in the Schools. 51: 866-878
Cho HJ, Kingston N. (2013) Why IEP Teams Assign Low Performers With Mild Disabilities to the Alternate Assessment Based on Alternate Achievement Standards Journal of Special Education. 47: 162-174
Gu F, Little TD, Kingston NM. (2013) Misestimation of reliability using coefficient alpha and structural equation modeling when assumptions of tau-equivalence and uncorrelated errors are violated Methodology. 9: 30-40
See more...