Year |
Citation |
Score |
2019 |
Liu C, Han KT, Li J. Compromised Item Detection for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Frontiers in Psychology. 10: 829. PMID 31105612 DOI: 10.3389/Fpsyg.2019.00829 |
0.431 |
|
2016 |
Han KT. Maximum Likelihood Score Estimation Method With Fences for Short-Length Tests and Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement. 40: 289-301. PMID 29881054 DOI: 10.1177/0146621616631317 |
0.424 |
|
2016 |
Han KT. Maximum Likelihood Score Estimation Method With Fences for Short-Length Tests and Computerized Adaptive Tests Applied Psychological Measurement. 40: 289-301. DOI: 10.1177/0146621616631317 |
0.329 |
|
2015 |
Deng N, Anatchkova MD, Waring ME, Han KT, Ware JE. Testing item response theory invariance of the standardized Quality-of-life Disease Impact Scale (QDIS(®)) in acute coronary syndrome patients: differential functioning of items and test. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation. 24: 1809-22. PMID 25601166 DOI: 10.1007/S11136-015-0916-8 |
0.368 |
|
2015 |
Han KT, Wells CS, Hambleton RK. Effect of adjusting pseudo-guessing parameter estimates on test scaling when item parameter drift is present Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. 20: 1-15. DOI: 10.7275/Jyyy-Wp74 |
0.615 |
|
2014 |
Han KT, Guo F. Impact of violation of the missing-at-random assumption on full-information maximum likelihood method in multidimensional adaptive testing Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. 19. DOI: 10.7275/P7X7-Jb36 |
0.429 |
|
2013 |
Han KT. MSTGen: Simulated Data Generator for Multistage Testing Applied Psychological Measurement. 37: 666-668. DOI: 10.1177/0146621613499639 |
0.323 |
|
2013 |
Han KT. Item Pocket Method to Allow Response Review and Change in Computerized Adaptive Testing Applied Psychological Measurement. 37: 259-275. DOI: 10.1177/0146621612473638 |
0.41 |
|
2013 |
Paek I, Han KT. IRTPRO 2.1 for Windows (Item Response Theory for Patient-Reported Outcomes) Applied Psychological Measurement. 37: 242-252. DOI: 10.1177/0146621612468223 |
0.35 |
|
2013 |
Deng N, Han KT, Hambleton RK. A Review of DIMPACK Version 1.0: Conditional Covariance-Based Test Dimensionality Analysis Package Applied Psychological Measurement. 37: 162-172. DOI: 10.1177/0146621612465487 |
0.389 |
|
2013 |
Talento-Miller E, Guo F, Han KT. Examining Test Speededness by Native Language International Journal of Testing. 13: 89-104. DOI: 10.1080/15305058.2011.653021 |
0.35 |
|
2012 |
Han KT. Fixing the c parameter in the Three-Parameter logistic model Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. 17: 1-24. DOI: 10.7275/F0Gz-Kc87 |
0.338 |
|
2012 |
Han KT. SimulCAT: Windows Software for Simulating Computerized Adaptive Test Administration Applied Psychological Measurement. 36: 64-66. DOI: 10.1177/0146621611414407 |
0.339 |
|
2012 |
Han KT. An Efficiency Balanced Information Criterion for Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing Journal of Educational Measurement. 49: 225-246. DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3984.2012.00173.X |
0.404 |
|
2012 |
Han KT, Wells CS, Sireci SG. The Impact of Multidirectional Item Parameter Drift on IRT Scaling Coefficients and Proficiency Estimates Applied Measurement in Education. 25: 97-117. DOI: 10.1080/08957347.2012.660000 |
0.633 |
|
2009 |
Liang T, Han KT, Hambleton RK. ResidPlots-2: Computer software for IRT graphical residual analyses Applied Psychological Measurement. 33: 411-412. DOI: 10.1177/0146621608329502 |
0.464 |
|
2009 |
Han KT. IRTEQ: Windows application that implements item response theory scaling and equating Applied Psychological Measurement. 33: 491-493. DOI: 10.1177/0146621608319513 |
0.344 |
|
2008 |
Sireci SG, Han KT, Wells CS. Methods for evaluating the validity of test scores for English language learners Educational Assessment. 13: 108-131. DOI: 10.1080/10627190802394255 |
0.611 |
|
2007 |
Han KT. WinGen: Windows software that generates item response theory parameters and item responses Applied Psychological Measurement. 31: 457-459. DOI: 10.1177/0146621607299271 |
0.361 |
|
Show low-probability matches. |