☰

Cristina L. Archer, Ph.D. - Publications

Affiliations: 
2004 Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 
Area:
Environmental Engineering, Atmospheric Science Physics, Energy
Tree Info Similar researchers PubMed Report error

48 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2020 Golbazi M, Archer CL. Surface roughness for offshore wind energy Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1452: 012024. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1452/1/012024  0.546
2020 Nouri R, Vasel-Be-Hagh A, Archer CL. The Coriolis force and the direction of rotation of the blades significantly affect the wake of wind turbines Applied Energy. 277: 115511. DOI: 10.1016/J.Apenergy.2020.115511  0.703
2020 Archer CL, Vasel-Be-Hagh A, Yan C, Wu S, Pan Y, Brodie JF, Maguire AE. Corrigendum to “Review and evaluation of wake loss models for wind energy applications” [Appl. Energy 226 (2018) 1187–1207] Applied Energy. 266: 114845. DOI: 10.1016/J.Apenergy.2020.114845  0.556
2020 Al Fahel N, Archer CL. Observed onshore precipitation changes after the installation of offshore wind farms Bulletin of Atmospheric Science and Technology. 1: 179-203. DOI: 10.1007/s42865-020-00012-7  0.635
2019 Golbazi M, Archer CL. Methods to Estimate Surface Roughness Length for Offshore Wind Energy Advances in Meteorology. 2019: 1-15. DOI: 10.1155/2019/5695481  0.696
2019 Archer CL, Wu S, Vasel-Be-Hagh A, Brodie JF, Delgado R, St. Pé A, Oncley S, Semmer S. The VERTEX field campaign: observations of near-ground effects of wind turbine wakes Journal of Turbulence. 20: 64-92. DOI: 10.1080/14685248.2019.1572161  0.712
2019 Archer CL, Vasel-Be-Hagh A. Wake steering via yaw control in multi-turbine wind farms: Recommendations based on large-eddy simulation Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 33: 34-43. DOI: 10.1016/J.Seta.2019.03.002  0.685
2019 Yan C, Pan Y, Archer CL. A general method to estimate wind farm power using artificial neural networks Wind Energy. 22: 1421-1432. DOI: 10.1002/We.2379  0.561
2018 Pan Y, Yan C, Archer CL. Precipitation reduction during Hurricane Harvey with simulated offshore wind farms Environmental Research Letters. 13: 084007. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/Aad245  0.745
2018 Archer CL, Vasel-Be-Hagh A, Yan C, Wu S, Pan Y, Brodie JF, Maguire AE. Review and evaluation of wake loss models for wind energy applications Applied Energy. 226: 1187-1207. DOI: 10.1016/J.Apenergy.2018.05.085  0.709
2018 Yan C, Archer CL. Assessing compressibility effects on the performance of large horizontal-axis wind turbines Applied Energy. 212: 33-45. DOI: 10.1016/J.Apenergy.2017.12.020  0.716
2018 Pan Y, Archer CL. A Hybrid Wind-Farm Parametrization for Mesoscale and Climate Models Boundary-Layer Meteorology. 168: 469-495. DOI: 10.1007/S10546-018-0351-9  0.733
2017 Vasel-Be-Hagh A, Archer CL. Wind farms with counter-rotating wind turbines Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 24: 19-30. DOI: 10.1016/J.Seta.2016.10.004  0.724
2017 Simão H, Powell W, Archer C, Kempton W. The challenge of integrating offshore wind power in the U.S. electric grid. Part II: Simulation of electricity market operations Renewable Energy. 103: 418-431. DOI: 10.1016/J.Renene.2016.11.049  0.614
2017 Archer C, Simão H, Kempton W, Powell W, Dvorak M. The challenge of integrating offshore wind power in the U.S. electric grid. Part I: Wind forecast error Renewable Energy. 103: 346-360. DOI: 10.1016/J.Renene.2016.11.047  0.687
2017 Santos-Alamillos FJ, Archer CL, Noel L, Budischak C, Facciolo W. Assessing the economic feasibility of the gradual decarbonization of a large electric power system Journal of Cleaner Production. 147: 130-141. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jclepro.2017.01.097  0.565
2017 Vasel-Be-Hagh A, Archer CL. Wind farm hub height optimization Applied Energy. 195: 905-921. DOI: 10.1016/J.Apenergy.2017.03.089  0.721
2017 Noel L, Brodie JF, Kempton W, Archer CL, Budischak C. Cost minimization of generation, storage, and new loads, comparing costs with and without externalities Applied Energy. 189: 110-121. DOI: 10.1016/J.Apenergy.2016.12.060  0.403
2017 Xie S, Archer CL. A Numerical Study of Wind-Turbine Wakes for Three Atmospheric Stability Conditions Boundary-Layer Meteorology. 165: 87-112. DOI: 10.1007/S10546-017-0259-9  0.707
2017 Ghaisas NS, Archer CL, Xie S, Wu S, Maguire E. Evaluation of layout and atmospheric stability effects in wind farms using large-eddy simulation Wind Energy. 20: 1227-1240. DOI: 10.1002/We.2091  0.633
2016 Ghaisas NS, Archer CL. Geometry-based models for studying the effects of wind farm layout Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. 33: 481-501. DOI: 10.1175/Jtech-D-14-00199.1  0.721
2016 Colle BA, Sienkiewicz MJ, Archer C, Veron D, Veron F, Kempton W, Mak JE. Improving the Mapping and Prediction of Offshore Wind Resources (IMPOWR): Experimental Overview and First Results Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 97: 1377-1390. DOI: 10.1175/Bams-D-14-00253.1  0.68
2016 Xie S, Archer CL, Ghaisas N, Meneveau C. Benefits of collocating vertical-axis and horizontal-axis wind turbines in large wind farms Wind Energy. DOI: 10.1002/We.1990  0.734
2016 Archer CL, Colle BA, Veron DL, Veron F, Sienkiewicz MJ. On the predominance of unstable atmospheric conditions in the marine boundary layer offshore of the U.S. northeastern coast Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. DOI: 10.1002/2016Jd024896  0.728
2015 Firestone J, Archer CL, Gardner MP, Madsen JA, Prasad AK, Veron DE. Opinion: The time has come for offshore wind power in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 112: 11985-8. PMID 26417102 DOI: 10.1073/Pnas.1515376112  0.66
2015 Dvorak MJ, Stoutenburg ED, Archer CL, Kempton W, Jacobson MZ. Where is the ideal location for a US East Coast offshore grid? Geophysical Research Letters. 39. DOI: 10.1029/2011Gl050659  0.763
2015 Xie S, Archer C. Self-similarity and turbulence characteristics of wind turbine wakes via large-eddy simulation Wind Energy. 18: 1815-1838. DOI: 10.1002/We.1792  0.673
2014 Archer CL, Colle BA, Delle Monache L, Dvorak MJ, Lundquist J, Bailey BH, Beaucage P, Churchfield MJ, Fitch AC, Kosovic B, Lee S, Moriarty PJ, Simao H, Stevens RJAM, Veron D, et al. Meteorology for coastal/offshore wind energy in the United States: Recommendations and research needs for the next 10 years Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 95: 515-519. DOI: 10.1175/Bams-D-13-00108.1  0.599
2014 Jacobson MZ, Archer CL, Kempton W. Taming hurricanes with arrays of offshore wind turbines Nature Climate Change. 4: 195-200. DOI: 10.1038/Nclimate2120  0.768
2014 Archer CL, Delle Monache L, Rife DL. Airborne wind energy: Optimal locations and variability Renewable Energy. 64: 180-186. DOI: 10.1016/J.Renene.2013.10.044  0.763
2013 Archer CL, Jacobson MZ. Geographical and seasonal variability of the global "practical" wind resources Applied Geography. 45: 119-130. DOI: 10.1016/J.Apgeog.2013.07.006  0.793
2013 Archer CL. An introduction to meteorology for airborne wind energy Green Energy and Technology. 81-94. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39965-7_5  0.592
2013 Archer CL, Mirzaeisefat S, Lee S. Quantifying the sensitivity of wind farm performance to array layout options using large-eddy simulation Geophysical Research Letters. 40: 4963-4970. DOI: 10.1002/Grl.50911  0.656
2012 Jacobson MZ, Archer CL. Saturation wind power potential and its implications for wind energy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109: 15679-84. PMID 23019353 DOI: 10.1073/Pnas.1208993109  0.783
2012 Mason JE, Archer CL. Baseload electricity from wind via compressed air energy storage (CAES) Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 16: 1099-1109. DOI: 10.1016/J.Rser.2011.11.009  0.645
2010 Dvorak MJ, Archer CL, Jacobson MZ. California offshore wind energy potential Renewable Energy. 35: 1244-1254. DOI: 10.1016/J.Renene.2009.11.022  0.777
2009 Archer CL, Caldeira K. Global assessment of high-altitude wind power Energies. 2: 307-319. DOI: 10.3390/En20200307  0.738
2008 Null J, Archer C. Wind Power: The Ultimate Renewable Energy Source Weatherwise. 61: 34-41. DOI: 10.3200/Wewi.613.4.34-41  0.647
2008 Jiang Q, Doyle JD, Haack T, Dvorak MJ, Archer CL, Jacobson MZ. Exploring wind energy potential off the California coast Geophysical Research Letters. 35. DOI: 10.1029/2008Gl034674  0.768
2008 Archer CL, Caldeira K. Historical trends in the jet streams Geophysical Research Letters. 35. DOI: 10.1029/2008Gl033614  0.398
2007 Archer CL, Jacobson MZ. Supplying baseload power and reducing transmission requirements by interconnecting wind farms Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. 46: 1701-1717. DOI: 10.1175/2007Jamc1538.1  0.8
2007 Kempton W, Archer CL, Dhanju A, Garvine RW, Jacobson MZ. Large CO2 reductions via offshore wind power matched to inherent storage in energy end-uses Geophysical Research Letters. 34. DOI: 10.1029/2006Gl028016  0.757
2006 Archer C, Jacobson MZ. Comment on "Evaluation of a wind power parameterization using tower observations" by Steven M. Lazarus and Jennifer Bewley Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 111. DOI: 10.1029/2005Jd006098  0.774
2005 Archer CL, Jacobson MZ. The Santa Cruz eddy. Part II: Mechanisms of formation Monthly Weather Review. 133: 2387-2405. DOI: 10.1175/Mwr2979.1  0.618
2005 Archer CL, Jacobson MZ, Ludwig FL. The Santa Cruz Eddy. Part I: Observations and statistics Monthly Weather Review. 133: 767-782. DOI: 10.1175/Mwr2885.1  0.633
2005 Archer CL, Jacobson MZ. Evaluation of global wind power Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres. 110: 1-20. DOI: 10.1029/2004Jd005462  0.751
2004 Archer CL. Correction to “Spatial and temporal distributions of U.S. winds and wind power at 80 m derived from measurements” Journal of Geophysical Research. 109. DOI: 10.1029/2004Jd005099  0.605
2003 Archer CL, Jacobson MZ. Spatial and temporal distributions of U.S. winds and wind power at 80 m derived from measurements Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres. 108. DOI: 10.1029/2002Jd002076  0.791
Show low-probability matches.