William R. Shadish - Publications

Affiliations: 
The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States 
Area:
Experimental Psychology, Statistics

85 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2019 Tate RL, Perdices M, Rosenkoetter U, McDonald S, Togher L, Shadish W, Horner R, Kratochwill T, Barlow DH, Kazdin A, Sampson M, Shamseer L, Vohra S. Reprint of “The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and Elaboration” Pratiques Psychologiques. 25: 119-151. DOI: 10.1016/J.Prps.2019.03.001  0.389
2018 Rindskopf DM, Shadish WR, Clark MH. Using Bayesian Correspondence Criteria to Compare Results From a Randomized Experiment and a Quasi-Experiment Allowing Self-Selection. Evaluation Review. 193841X18789532. PMID 30060688 DOI: 10.1177/0193841X18789532  0.359
2016 Tate RL, Perdices M, Rosenkoetter U, Shadish W, Vohra S, Barlow DH, Horner R, Kazdin A, Kratochwill T, McDonald S, Sampson M, Shamseer L, Togher L, Albin R, Backman C, et al. The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 1-15. PMID 27499422 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2016.1190533  0.375
2016 Tate RL, Perdices M, Rosenkoetter U, Shadish W, Vohra S, Barlow DH, Horner R, Kazdin A, Kratochwill T, McDonald S, Sampson M, Shamseer L, Togher L, Albin R, Backman C, et al. The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement. Physical Therapy. 96: e1-e10. PMID 27371692 DOI: 10.2522/Ptj.2016.96.7.E1  0.389
2016 Tate RL, Perdices M, Rosenkoetter U, Shadish W, Vohra S, Barlow DH, Horner R, Kazdin A, Kratochwill T, McDonald S, Sampson M, Shamseer L, Togher L, Albin R, Backman C, et al. The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy : Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association. 70: 7004320010p1-7004320. PMID 27294998 DOI: 10.5014/Ajot.2016.704002  0.338
2016 Tate RL, Perdices M, Rosenkoetter U, Shadish W, Vohra S, Barlow DH, Horner R, Kazdin A, Kratochwill T, McDonald S, Sampson M, Shamseer L, Togher L, Albin R, Backman C, et al. The Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 statement. Journal of School Psychology. 56: 133-142. PMID 27268573 DOI: 10.1016/J.Jsp.2016.04.001  0.389
2016 Tate RL, Perdices M, Rosenkoetter U, Shadish W, Vohra S, Barlow DH, Horner R, Kazdin A, Kratochwill T, McDonald S, Sampson M, Shamseer L, Togher L, Albin R, Backman C, et al. The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 statement: Énoncé concernant la Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. Revue Canadienne D'ErgothéRapie. 83: 184-95. PMID 27231387 DOI: 10.1177/0008417416648124  0.375
2016 Shadish WR, Zelinsky NA, Vevea JL, Kratochwill TR. A survey of publication practices of single-case design researchers when treatments have small or large effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. PMID 27174301 DOI: 10.1002/Jaba.308  0.367
2016 Tate RL, Rosenkoetter U, Vohra S, Horner R, Kratochwill T, Sampson M, Togher L, Backman C, Evans JJ, Manolov R, Nickels L, Ownsworth T, Schmid CH, Perdices M, Shadish W, et al. The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. PMID 27101888 DOI: 10.1037/Arc0000026  0.389
2016 Shadish WR, Rindskopf DM, Boyajian JG. Single-Case Experimental Design Yielded an Effect Estimate Corresponding to a Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. PMID 27079848 DOI: 10.1016/J.Jclinepi.2016.01.035  0.349
2016 Zelinsky NAM, Shadish W. A demonstration of how to do a meta-analysis that combines single-case designs with between-groups experiments: The effects of choice making on challenging behaviors performed by people with disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation. 21: 266-278. PMID 26809945 DOI: 10.3109/17518423.2015.1100690  0.375
2015 Cobb P, Shadish W. Abstract: Assessing Trend in Single-Case Designs Using Generalized Additive Models. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 50: 131. PMID 26609751 DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2014.988991  0.713
2015 Shamseer L, Sampson M, Bukutu C, Schmid CH, Nikles J, Tate R, Johnston BC, Zucker D, Shadish WR, Kravitz R, Guyatt G, Altman DG, Moher D, Vohra S. CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. PMID 26272791 DOI: 10.1016/J.Jclinepi.2015.05.018  0.305
2015 Shadish WR, Lecy JD. The meta-analytic big bang. Research Synthesis Methods. 6: 246-64. PMID 26212600 DOI: 10.1002/Jrsm.1132  0.353
2015 Shadish WR. Introduction to the special issue on the origins of modern meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods. 6: 219-20. PMID 26097018 DOI: 10.1002/Jrsm.1148  0.352
2015 Sullivan KJ, Shadish WR, Steiner PM. An introduction to modeling longitudinal data with generalized additive models: applications to single-case designs. Psychological Methods. 20: 26-42. PMID 24885341 DOI: 10.1037/Met0000020  0.408
2014 Shadish WR, Sullivan KJ. Erratum to: Characteristics of single-case designs used to assess intervention effects in 2008. Behavior Research Methods. PMID 25381019 DOI: 10.3758/S13428-014-0516-5  0.325
2014 Shadish WR, Zuur AF, Sullivan KJ. Using generalized additive (mixed) models to analyze single case designs. Journal of School Psychology. 52: 149-78. PMID 24606973 DOI: 10.1016/J.Jsp.2013.11.004  0.382
2014 Shadish WR, Hedges LV, Pustejovsky JE. Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs with a standardized mean difference statistic: a primer and applications. Journal of School Psychology. 52: 123-47. PMID 24606972 DOI: 10.1016/J.Jsp.2013.11.005  0.402
2014 Shadish WR. Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs: an introduction. Journal of School Psychology. 52: 109-22. PMID 24606971 DOI: 10.1016/J.Jsp.2013.11.009  0.426
2014 Shadish WR, Hedges LV, Pustejovsky JE, Boyajian JG, Sullivan KJ, Andrade A, Barrientos JL. A d-statistic for single-case designs that is equivalent to the usual between-groups d-statistic. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 24: 528-53. PMID 23862576 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2013.819021  0.374
2014 Pustejovsky JE, Hedges LV, Shadish WR. Design-Comparable effect sizes in multiple baseline designs: A general modeling framework Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 39: 368-393. DOI: 10.3102/1076998614547577  0.409
2014 Shadish WR. Statistical Analyses of Single-Case Designs: The Shape of Things to Come Current Directions in Psychological Science. 23: 139-146. DOI: 10.1177/0963721414524773  0.393
2014 Hitchcock JH, Horner RH, Kratochwill TR, Levin JR, Odom SL, Rindskopf DM, Shadish WR. The What Works Clearinghouse Single-Case Design Pilot Standards: Who Will Guard the Guards? Remedial and Special Education. 35: 145-152. DOI: 10.1177/0741932513518979  0.374
2013 Sullivan KJ, Shadish WR. Abstract: Modeling Single-Case Designs With Generalized Additive Models. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 48: 173. PMID 26789231 DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2013.752269  0.325
2013 Hedges LV, Pustejovsky JE, Shadish WR. A standardized mean difference effect size for multiple baseline designs across individuals. Research Synthesis Methods. 4: 324-41. PMID 26053946 DOI: 10.1002/Jrsm.1086  0.418
2013 Shadish WR, Kyse EN, Rindskopf DM. Analyzing data from single-case designs using multilevel models: new applications and some agenda items for future research. Psychological Methods. 18: 385-405. PMID 23834421 DOI: 10.1037/A0032964  0.411
2013 Shadish WR, Rindskopf DM, Hedges LV, Sullivan KJ. Bayesian estimates of autocorrelations in single-case designs. Behavior Research Methods. 45: 813-21. PMID 23239070 DOI: 10.3758/S13428-012-0282-1  0.357
2013 Shadish WR, Steiner PM, Cook TD. A Case Study About Why It Can Be Difficult To Test Whether Propensity Score Analysis Works in Field Experiments Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences. 3: 1-12. DOI: 10.2458/V3I2.16475  0.38
2013 Kratochwill TR, Hitchcock JH, Horner RH, Levin JR, Odom SL, Rindskopf DM, Shadish WR. Single-Case Intervention Research Design Standards Remedial and Special Education. 34: 26-38. DOI: 10.1177/0741932512452794  0.394
2013 Shadish WR. Propensity score analysis: Promise, reality and irrational exuberance Journal of Experimental Criminology. 9: 129-144. DOI: 10.1007/S11292-012-9166-8  0.415
2012 Hedges LV, Pustejovsky JE, Shadish WR. A standardized mean difference effect size for single case designs. Research Synthesis Methods. 3: 224-39. PMID 26062165 DOI: 10.1002/Jrsm.1052  0.417
2012 Murray DM, Blitstein JL, Hannan PJ, Shadish WR. Increasing the degrees of freedom in future group randomized trials: the df * method revisited. Evaluation Review. 36: 430-48. PMID 23640051 DOI: 10.1177/0193841X13480147  0.342
2012 Marcus SM, Stuart EA, Wang P, Shadish WR, Steiner PM. Estimating the causal effect of randomization versus treatment preference in a doubly randomized preference trial. Psychological Methods. 17: 244-54. PMID 22563844 DOI: 10.1037/A0028031  0.348
2012 Baldwin SA, Christian S, Berkeljon A, Shadish WR. The effects of family therapies for adolescent delinquency and substance abuse: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 38: 281-304. PMID 22283391 DOI: 10.1111/J.1752-0606.2011.00248.X  0.31
2011 Boyajian JG, Shadish WR. Abstract: A Meta-Analysis of the Autocorrelation in Single Case Designs. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 46: 1009. PMID 26736125 DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2011.636692  0.436
2011 Shadish WR, Sullivan KJ. Characteristics of single-case designs used to assess intervention effects in 2008. Behavior Research Methods. 43: 971-80. PMID 21656107 DOI: 10.3758/S13428-011-0111-Y  0.392
2011 Shadish WR, Galindo R, Wong VC, Steiner PM, Cook TD. A randomized experiment comparing random and cutoff-based assignment. Psychological Methods. 16: 179-91. PMID 21534684 DOI: 10.1037/A0023345  0.392
2011 Baldwin SA, Murray DM, Shadish WR, Pals SL, Holland JM, Abramowitz JS, Andersson G, Atkins DC, Carlbring P, Carroll KM, Christensen A, Eddington KM, Ehlers A, Feaster DJ, Keijsers GP, et al. Intraclass correlation associated with therapists: estimates and applications in planning psychotherapy research. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. 40: 15-33. PMID 21337212 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2010.520731  0.36
2011 Baldwin SA, Shadish WR. A Primer on Meta-analysis in Clinical Psychology Journal of Experimental Psychopathology. 2: 294-317. DOI: 10.5127/Jep.009610  0.368
2011 Steiner PM, Cook TD, Shadish WR. On the importance of reliable covariate measurement in selection bias adjustments using propensity scores Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 36: 213-236. DOI: 10.3102/1076998610375835  0.348
2011 Shadish WR. Randomized controlled studies and alternative designs in outcome studies: Challenges and opportunities Research On Social Work Practice. 21: 636-643. DOI: 10.1177/1049731511403324  0.412
2011 Shadish WR. The truth about validity New Directions For Evaluation. 130: 107-117. DOI: 10.1002/Ev.369  0.355
2010 Steiner PM, Cook TD, Shadish WR, Clark MH. The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies. Psychological Methods. 15: 250-67. PMID 20822251 DOI: 10.1037/A0018719  0.343
2010 Shadish WR. Campbell and Rubin: A primer and comparison of their approaches to causal inference in field settings. Psychological Methods. 15: 3-17. PMID 20230099 DOI: 10.1037/A0015916  0.377
2010 Shadish WR, Steiner PM. A Primer on Propensity Score Analysis Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews. 10: 19-26. DOI: 10.1053/J.Nainr.2009.12.010  0.403
2009 Shadish WR, Cook TD. The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions. Annual Review of Psychology. 60: 607-29. PMID 18616391 DOI: 10.1146/Annurev.Psych.60.110707.163544  0.406
2009 Cook TD, Shadish WR, Wong VC. Three Conditions under Which Experiments and Observational Studies Produce Comparable Causal Estimates: New Findings from Within-Study Comparisons Social Experimentation, Program Evaluation, and Public Policy. 92-118. DOI: 10.1002/Pam.20375  0.394
2008 Pals SL, Murray DM, Alfano CM, Shadish WR, Hannan PJ, Baker WL. Individually randomized group treatment trials: a critical appraisal of frequently used design and analytic approaches. American Journal of Public Health. 98: 1418-24. PMID 18556603 DOI: 10.2105/Ajph.2007.127027  0.373
2008 Pals SL, Murray DM, Alfano CM, Shadish WR, Hannan PJ, Baker WL. Individually randomized group treatment trials: A critical appraisal of frequently used design and analytic approaches (American Journal of Public Health (2008) 98 (1418-1424) doi 10.2105/AJPH.2007/127027) American Journal of Public Health. 98: 2120. DOI: 10.2105/Ajph.2007.127027E  0.332
2008 Shadish WR, Clark MH, Steiner PM. Can nonrandomized experiments yield accurate answers? A randomized experiment comparing random and nonrandom assignments Journal of the American Statistical Association. 103: 1334-1343. DOI: 10.1198/016214508000000733  0.348
2008 Shadish WR, Rindskopf DM, Hedges LV. The state of the science in the meta-analysis of single-case experimental designs Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention. 2: 188-196. DOI: 10.1080/17489530802581603  0.45
2008 Floyd RG, Clark MH, Shadish WR. The Exchangeability of IQs: Implications for Professional Psychology Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 39: 414-423. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.39.4.414  0.309
2007 Shadish WR. A world without meta-analysis Journal of Experimental Criminology. 3: 281-291. DOI: 10.1007/S11292-007-9034-0  0.31
2007 Shadish WR, Rindskopf DM. Methods for evidence-based practice: Quantitative synthesis of single-subject designs New Directions For Evaluation. 2007: 95-109. DOI: 10.1002/Ev.217  0.329
2006 Wilson DB, Shadish WR. On blowing trumpets to the tulips: to prove or not to prove the null hypothesis--comment on Bösch, Steinkamp, and Boller (2006). Psychological Bulletin. 132: 524-8; discussion 53. PMID 16822163 DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.4.524  0.309
2005 Baldwin SA, Murray DM, Shadish WR. Empirically supported treatments or type I errors? Problems with the analysis of data from group-administered treatments. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 73: 924-35. PMID 16287392 DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.5.924  0.341
2005 Luellen JK, Shadish WR, Clark MH. Propensity scores: an introduction and experimental test. Evaluation Review. 29: 530-58. PMID 16244051 DOI: 10.1177/0193841X05275596  0.696
2005 Blitstein JL, Murray DM, Hannan PJ, Shadish WR. Increasing the degrees of freedom in future group randomized trials: the df* approach. Evaluation Review. 29: 268-86. PMID 15860766 DOI: 10.1177/0193841X04273258  0.359
2005 Blitstein JL, Hannan PJ, Murray DM, Shadish WR. Increasing the degrees of freedom in existing group randomized trials: the df* approach. Evaluation Review. 29: 241-67. PMID 15860765 DOI: 10.1177/0193841X04273257  0.368
2005 Shadish WR, Baldwin SA. Effects of behavioral marital therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 73: 6-14. PMID 15709827 DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.1.6  0.33
2005 Shadish WR, Chacón-Moscoso S, Sánchez-Meca J. Evidence-based decision making: Enhancing systematic reviews of program evaluation results in Europe Evaluation. 11: 95-109. DOI: 10.1177/1356389005053196  0.387
2003 Shadish WR, Baldwin SA. Meta-analysis of MFT interventions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 29: 547-70. PMID 14593694 DOI: 10.1111/J.1752-0606.2003.Tb01694.X  0.347
2002 Shadish WR. Revisiting field experimentation: field notes for the future. Psychological Methods. 7: 3-18. PMID 11928889 DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.3  0.361
2000 Shadish WR, Navarro AM, Matt GE, Phillips G. The effects of psychological therapies under clinically representative conditions: A meta-analysis Psychological Bulletin. 126: 512-529. PMID 10900994 DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.512  0.328
1999 Kownacki RJ, Shadish WR. Does alcoholics anonymous work? The results from a meta-analysis of controlled experiments Substance Use and Misuse. 34: 1897-1916. PMID 10540977 DOI: 10.3109/10826089909039431  0.333
1998 Haddock CK, Rindskopf D, Shadish WR. Using Odds Ratios as Effect Sizes for Meta-Analysis of Dichotomous Data: A Primer on Methods and Issues Psychological Methods. 3: 339-353. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.3.339  0.375
1998 Shadish WR, Hu X, Glaser RR, Kownacki R, Wong S. A Method for Exploring the Effects of Attrition in Randomized Experiments with Dichotomous Outcomes Psychological Methods. 3: 3-22. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.1.3  0.591
1997 Stanton MD, Shadish WR. Outcome, attrition, and family-couples treatment for drug abuse: A meta-analysis and review of the controlled, comparative studies Psychological Bulletin. 122: 170-191. PMID 9283299 DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.122.2.170  0.3
1997 Shadish WR, Heinsman DT. Experiments versus quasi-experiments: do they yield the same answer? Nida Research Monograph. 170: 147-164. PMID 9154256 DOI: 10.1037/E495592006-008  0.348
1996 Ray JW, Shadish WR. How interchangeable are different estimators of effect size? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 64: 1316-1325. PMID 8991318 DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1316  0.323
1996 Shadish WR, Ragsdale K. Random versus nonrandom assignment in controlled experiments: Do you get the same answer? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 64: 1290-1305. PMID 8991316 DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1290  0.395
1996 Heinsman DT, Shadish WR. Assignment methods in experimentation: When do nonrandomized experiments approximate answers from randomized experiments? Psychological Methods. 1: 154-169. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.154  0.386
1996 Shadish WR. Meta-Analysis and the Exploration of Causal Mediating Processes: A Primer of Examples, Methods, and Issues Psychological Methods. 1: 47-65. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.47  0.351
1995 Shadish WR, Ragsdale K, Glaser RR, Montgomery LM. The Efficacy And Effectiveness Of Marital And Family Therapy: A Perspective From Meta‐Analysis Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 21: 345-360. DOI: 10.1111/J.1752-0606.1995.Tb00170.X  0.619
1995 Shadish WR. The logic of generalization: Five principles common to experiments and ethnographies American Journal of Community Psychology. 23: 419-428. DOI: 10.1007/Bf02506951  0.331
1994 Cook TD, Shadish WR. Social experiments: Some developments over the past fifteen years Annual Review of Psychology. 45: 545-580. DOI: 10.1146/Annurev.Ps.45.020194.002553  0.372
1993 Shadish WR, Montgomery LM, Wilson P, Wilson MR, Bright I, Okwumabua T. Effects of Family and Marital Psychotherapies: A Meta-Analysis Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 61: 992-1002. PMID 8113500 DOI: 10.1037//0022-006X.61.6.992  0.314
1993 Shadish WR. Critical multiplism: A research strategy and its attendant tactics New Directions For Program Evaluation. 1993: 13-57. DOI: 10.1002/Ev.1660  0.306
1991 Shadish WR, Sweeney RB. Mediators and Moderators in Meta-Analysis: There's a Reason We Don't Let Dodo Birds Tell Us Which Psychotherapies Should Have Prizes Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 59: 883-893. PMID 1837794 DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.59.6.883  0.356
1989 Shadish WR, Doherty M, Montgomery LM. How many studies are in the file drawer? An estimate from the family/marital psychotherapy literature Clinical Psychology Review. 9: 589-603. DOI: 10.1016/0272-7358(89)90013-5  0.363
1987 Neimeyer RA, Shadish WR. Optimizing scientific validity: Toward an Interdisciplinary Science Studies Science Communication. 8: 463-485. DOI: 10.1177/107554708700800303  0.328
1986 Houts AC, Cook TD, Shadish WR. The person-situation debate: A critical multiplist perspective Journal of Personality. 54: 52-105. DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-6494.1986.Tb00390.X  0.313
1982 Shadish WR, Thomas S, Bootzin RR. Criteria for success in deinstitutionalization: perceptions of nursing homes by different interest groups. American Journal of Community Psychology. 10: 553-66. PMID 7158618 DOI: 10.1007/Bf00894144  0.308
1980 Shadish WR. Nonverbal interventions in clinical groups Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 48: 164-168. PMID 7365054 DOI: 10.1037//0022-006X.48.2.164  0.328
Show low-probability matches.