Year |
Citation |
Score |
2020 |
Yi F, Gudaj RT, Arefieva V, Yanbykh R, Mishchuk S, Potenko TA, Zhou J, Zuenko I, Kenina D. Socio-economic Impact of Chinese Agribusiness Entrepreneurs in Russian Far East on Local Farmers Journal of Agricultural Science. 12: 26. DOI: 10.5539/jas.v12n4p26 |
0.303 |
|
2020 |
Yi F, Zhou M, Zhang YY. Value of Incorporating ENSO Forecast in Crop Insurance Programs American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 102: 439-457. DOI: 10.1002/ajae.12034 |
0.318 |
|
2019 |
Li Y, Yi F, Wang Y, Gudaj R. The Value of El Niño-Southern Oscillation Forecasts to China’s Agriculture Sustainability. 11: 4184. DOI: 10.3390/SU11154184 |
0.336 |
|
2019 |
Tian X, Yi F, Yu X. Rising cost of labor and transformations in grain production in China China Agricultural Economic Review. 12: 158-172. DOI: 10.1108/caer-04-2018-0067 |
0.322 |
|
2018 |
Yi F, McCarl B. Increasing the effectiveness of the Chinese grain subsidy: a quantitative analysis China Agricultural Economic Review. 10: 538-557. DOI: 10.1108/Caer-08-2016-0136 |
0.369 |
|
2018 |
Yi F, McCarl BA, Zhou X, Jiang F. Damages of surface ozone: evidence from agricultural sector in China Environmental Research Letters. 13: 034019. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/Aaa6D9 |
0.308 |
|
2015 |
Han X, Yi F. A stochastic control model of investment, production, and consumption on a finite horizon Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences. 38: 1070-1080. DOI: 10.1002/mma.3129 |
0.315 |
|
2014 |
Yi F, Mérel P, Lee J, Farzin YH, Six J. Switchgrass in California: Where, and at what price? Gcb Bioenergy. 6: 672-686. DOI: 10.1111/Gcbb.12075 |
0.599 |
|
2014 |
Mérel P, Yi F, Lee J, Six J. A regional bio-economic model of nitrogen use in cropping American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 96: 67-91. DOI: 10.1093/Ajae/Aat053 |
0.605 |
|
2011 |
Mérel P, Simon LK, Yi F. A fully calibrated generalized constant-elasticity-of-substitution programming model of agricultural supply American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 93: 936-948. DOI: 10.1093/Ajae/Aar029 |
0.606 |
|
2000 |
Yi F. Dynamic energy-demand models: A comparison Energy Economics. 22: 285-297. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-9883(99)00042-0 |
0.316 |
|
Show low-probability matches. |