Joseph Felsenstein, Ph.D.

Affiliations: 
Genome Sciences, Biology University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle, WA 
Area:
phylogeny, coalescents
Website:
http://evolution.gs.washington.edu/felsenstein.html
Google:
"Joseph Felsenstein"
Cross-listing: FlyTree

BETA: Related publications

Publications

You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Leaché AD, Banbury BL, Felsenstein J, et al. (2015) Short Tree, Long Tree, Right Tree, Wrong Tree: New Acquisition Bias Corrections for Inferring SNP Phylogenies. Systematic Biology. 64: 1032-47
Felsenstein J. (2014) Covariation of gene frequencies in a stepping-stone lattice of populations. Theoretical Population Biology. 100: 88-97
Bryant D, Bouckaert R, Felsenstein J, et al. (2012) Inferring species trees directly from biallelic genetic markers: bypassing gene trees in a full coalescent analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 29: 1917-32
Felsenstein J. (2012) A comparative method for both discrete and continuous characters using the threshold model. The American Naturalist. 179: 145-56
Stone GN, Nee S, Felsenstein J. (2011) Controlling for non-independence in comparative analysis of patterns across populations within species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 366: 1410-24
Emery LS, Felsenstein J, Akey JM. (2010) Estimators of the human effective sex ratio detect sex biases on different timescales. American Journal of Human Genetics. 87: 848-56
RoyChoudhury A, Felsenstein J, Thompson EA. (2008) A two-stage pruning algorithm for likelihood computation for a population tree. Genetics. 180: 1095-105
Felsenstein J. (2008) Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised. The American Naturalist. 171: 713-25
O'Meara B, Alfaro M, Bell C, et al. (2008) Comparative methods in R hackathon Nature Precedings
Felsenstein J. (2006) Accuracy of coalescent likelihood estimates: do we need more sites, more sequences, or more loci? Molecular Biology and Evolution. 23: 691-700
See more...