Year |
Citation |
Score |
2021 |
Carlson K, Potter D. Focus Attracts Attachment. Language and Speech. 238309211033321. PMID 34289730 DOI: 10.1177/00238309211033321 |
0.64 |
|
2020 |
Kim N, Carlson K, Dickey MW, Yoshida M. Author accepted manuscript: Processing Gapping: Parallelism and Grammatical Constraints. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 1747021820903461. PMID 31952450 DOI: 10.1177/1747021820903461 |
0.519 |
|
2019 |
Harris J, Carlson K. Correlate not optional: PP sprouting and parallelism in "much less" ellipsis. Glossa (London). 4. PMID 31360775 DOI: 10.5334/Gjgl.707 |
0.632 |
|
2018 |
Carlson K, Harris JA. Zero-Adjective Contrast in Much-less Ellipsis: The Advantage for Parallel Syntax. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 33: 77-97. PMID 29423419 DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1366530 |
0.648 |
|
2017 |
Harris JA, Carlson K. Information Structure Preferences in Focus-Sensitive Ellipsis: How Defaults Persist. Language and Speech. 23830917737110. PMID 29119869 DOI: 10.1177/0023830917737110 |
0.659 |
|
2017 |
Rohde H, Tyler J, Carlson K. Form and function: Optional complementizers reduce causal inferences. Glossa (London). 2. PMID 28804781 DOI: 10.5334/Gjgl.134 |
0.358 |
|
2017 |
Carlson K, Tyler JC. Accents, Not Just Prosodic Boundaries, Influence Syntactic Attachment. Language and Speech. 23830917712282. PMID 28686067 DOI: 10.1177/0023830917712282 |
0.546 |
|
2015 |
Harris JA, Carlson K. Keep it local (and final): Remnant preferences in 'let alone' ellipsis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 1-56. PMID 26085004 DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1062526 |
0.656 |
|
2014 |
Carlson K. Predicting contrast in sentences with and without focus marking. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue Internationale De Linguistique Generale. 150: 78-91. PMID 25177047 DOI: 10.1016/J.Lingua.2014.07.008 |
0.397 |
|
2014 |
Frazier L, Clifton C, Carlson K, Harris JA. Standing alone with prosodic help. Language and Cognitive Processes. 29: 459-469. PMID 24729648 DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2013.828095 |
0.698 |
|
2013 |
Carlson K. The Role of Only in Contrasts in and out of Context. Discourse Processes. 50: 249-275. PMID 25237209 DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2013.778167 |
0.409 |
|
2013 |
German JS, Carlson K, Pierrehumbert JB. Reassignment of consonant allophones in rapid dialect acquisition Journal of Phonetics. 41: 228-248. DOI: 10.1016/J.Wocn.2013.03.001 |
0.348 |
|
2010 |
Anderson C, Carlson K. Syntactic structure guides prosody in temporarily ambiguous sentences. Language and Speech. 53: 472-93. PMID 21313990 DOI: 10.1177/0023830910372497 |
0.462 |
|
2009 |
Carlson K, Frazier L, Clifton C. How prosody constrains comprehension: A limited effect of prosodic packaging. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue Internationale De Linguistique Generale. 119: 1066-1082. PMID 21461181 DOI: 10.1016/J.Lingua.2008.11.003 |
0.644 |
|
2009 |
Carlson K, Clifton C, Frazier L. Nonlocal effects of prosodic boundaries. Memory & Cognition. 37: 1014-25. PMID 19744940 DOI: 10.3758/Mc.37.7.1014 |
0.607 |
|
2009 |
Carlson K, Dickey MW, Frazier L, Clifton C. Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 62: 114-39. PMID 18609404 DOI: 10.1080/17470210701880171 |
0.628 |
|
2009 |
Carlson K. How prosody influences sentence comprehension Linguistics and Language Compass. 3: 1188-1200. DOI: 10.1111/J.1749-818X.2009.00150.X |
0.516 |
|
2007 |
Frazier L, Clifton C, Carlson K. Focus and VP ellipsis. Language and Speech. 50: 1-21. PMID 17518101 DOI: 10.1177/00238309070500010101 |
0.599 |
|
2006 |
Clifton C, Carlson K, Frazier L. Tracking the what and why of speakers' choices: prosodic boundaries and the length of constituents. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 13: 854-61. PMID 17328385 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03194009 |
0.615 |
|
2006 |
Frazier L, Carlson K, Clifton C. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 10: 244-9. PMID 16651019 DOI: 10.1016/J.Tics.2006.04.002 |
0.666 |
|
2005 |
Carlson K, Dickey MW, Kennedy C. Structural economy in the processing and representation Of gapping sentences Syntax. 8: 208-228. DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-9612.2005.00079.X |
0.47 |
|
2004 |
Frazier L, Clifton C, Carlson K. Don't break, or do: Prosodic boundary preferences Lingua. 114: 3-27. DOI: 10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00044-5 |
0.682 |
|
2002 |
Clifton C, Carlson K, Frazier L. Informative prosodic boundaries. Language and Speech. 45: 87-114. PMID 12613557 DOI: 10.1177/00238309020450020101 |
0.639 |
|
2001 |
Carlson K. The effects of parallelism and prosody in the processing of gapping structures. Language and Speech. 44: 1-26. PMID 11430186 DOI: 10.1177/00238309010440010101 |
0.477 |
|
2001 |
Carlson K, Clifton C, Frazier L. Prosodic Boundaries in Adjunct Attachment Journal of Memory and Language. 45: 58-81. DOI: 10.1006/Jmla.2000.2762 |
0.593 |
|
2000 |
Schafer A, Carlson K, Clifton H, Frazier L. Focus and the Interpretation of Pitch Accent: Disambiguating Embedded Questions Language and Speech. 43: 75-105. DOI: 10.1177/00238309000430010301 |
0.711 |
|
Show low-probability matches. |