Year |
Citation |
Score |
2020 |
Gerlach L, McDougall K, Kelly F, Alexander A, Nolan F. Exploring the relationship between voice similarity estimates by listeners and by an automatic speaker recognition system incorporating phonetic features. Speech Communication. DOI: 10.1016/J.Specom.2020.08.003 |
0.417 |
|
2019 |
Friedrichs D, Nolan F, Rosen S. Do listeners rely on dynamic spectral properties in the recognition of high-pitched vowels? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 146: 3051-3051. DOI: 10.1121/1.5137575 |
0.313 |
|
2018 |
Leemann A, Kolly M, Nolan F, Li Y. The role of segments and prosody in the identification of a speaker’s dialect Journal of Phonetics. 68: 69-84. DOI: 10.1016/J.Wocn.2018.02.001 |
0.438 |
|
2016 |
Leemann A, Kolly M, Nolan F. Identifying a speaker's regional origin:the role of temporal information Speech Prosody. 1081-1085. DOI: 10.21437/Speechprosody.2016-222 |
0.359 |
|
2014 |
Nolan F, Jeon HS. Speech rhythm: a metaphor? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 369: 20130396. PMID 25385774 DOI: 10.1098/Rstb.2013.0396 |
0.431 |
|
2013 |
Jeon HS, Nolan F. The role of pitch and timing cues in the perception of phrasal grouping in Seoul Korean. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 133: 3039-49. PMID 23654407 DOI: 10.1121/1.4798663 |
0.309 |
|
2013 |
Nolan F, Grabe E. Preparing a voice lineup International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. 3: 74-94. DOI: 10.1558/Ijsll.V3I1.74 |
0.361 |
|
2013 |
Nolan F, Oh T. Identical twins, different voices International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. 3: 39-49. DOI: 10.1558/Ijsll.V3I1.39 |
0.304 |
|
2013 |
Nolan F, McDougall K, Hudson T. Effects of the telephone on perceived voice similarity: implications for voice line-ups International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. 20: 229-246. DOI: 10.1558/Ijsll.V20I2.229 |
0.405 |
|
2012 |
Nolan F. Degrees of freedom in speech production: an argument for native speakers in LADO International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. 19: 263-289. DOI: 10.1558/Ijsll.V19I2.263 |
0.433 |
|
2009 |
Nolan F, Asu EL. The Pairwise Variability Index and coexisting rhythms in language. Phonetica. 66: 64-77. PMID 19390231 DOI: 10.1159/000208931 |
0.376 |
|
2009 |
Nolan F, McDougall K, Jong Gd, Hudson T. The DyViS database: style-controlled recordings of 100 homogeneous speakers for forensic phonetic research International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. 16: 31-57. DOI: 10.1558/Ijsll.V16I1.31 |
0.386 |
|
2009 |
Lawrence S, Nolan F, McDougall K. Acoustic and perceptual effects of telephone transmission on vowel quality. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. 15: 161-192. DOI: 10.1558/Ijsll.V15I2.161 |
0.399 |
|
2007 |
Asu EL, Nolan F. The analysis of low accentuation in Estonian. Language and Speech. 50: 567-88. PMID 18330217 DOI: 10.1177/00238309070500040401 |
0.377 |
|
2006 |
Knight RA, Nolan F. The effect of pitch span on intonational plateaux Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 36: 21-38. DOI: 10.1017/S0025100306002349 |
0.355 |
|
2005 |
Nolan F, Grigoras C. A case for formant analysis in forensic speaker identification International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. 12: 143-173. DOI: 10.1558/Sll.2005.12.2.143 |
0.356 |
|
2003 |
Nolan F. A recent voice parade International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. 10: 277-291. DOI: 10.1558/Sll.2003.10.2.277 |
0.305 |
|
2002 |
Nolan F. Intonation in speaker identification: an experiment on pitch alignment features International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. 9: 1-21. DOI: 10.1558/Sll.2002.9.1.1 |
0.341 |
|
2002 |
Nolan F. The ‘telephone effect’ on formants: a response International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. 9: 74-82. DOI: 10.1558/Ijsll.V9I1.74 |
0.35 |
|
2000 |
Ling LE, Grabe E, Nolan F. Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: syllable-timing in Singapore English. Language and Speech. 43: 377-401. PMID 11419223 DOI: 10.1177/00238309000430040301 |
0.424 |
|
2000 |
Karlsson I, Banziger T, Dankovicová J, Johnstone T, Lindberg J, Melin H, Nolan F, Scherer K. Speaker verification with elicited speaking styles in the VeriVox project Speech Communication. 31: 121-129. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6393(99)00073-4 |
0.387 |
|
2000 |
Grabe E, Post B, Nolan F, Farrar KJ. Pitch accent realization in four varieties of British English Journal of Phonetics. 28: 161-185. DOI: 10.1006/Jpho.2000.0111 |
0.41 |
|
1999 |
Dankovičová J, Nolan F. Some acoustic effects of speaking style on utterances for automatic speaker verification Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 29: 115-128. DOI: 10.1017/S0025100300006496 |
0.39 |
|
1996 |
Nolan F, Holst T, ühnert BK. Modelling [s] to [∫] accommodation in English Journal of Phonetics. 24: 113-137. DOI: 10.1006/Jpho.1996.0008 |
0.341 |
|
1995 |
Warren P, Grabe E, Nolan F. Prosody, phonology and parsing in closure ambiguities Language and Cognitive Processes. 10: 457-486. DOI: 10.1080/01690969508407112 |
0.362 |
|
1995 |
Warren P, Nolan F, Grabe E, Holst T. Post-lexical and prosodic phonological processing Language and Cognitive Processes. 10: 411-417. DOI: 10.1080/01690969508407109 |
0.303 |
|
1994 |
Grabe E, Warren P, Nolan F. Resolving category ambiguities—evidence from stress shift Speech Communication. 15: 101-114. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6393(94)90045-0 |
0.315 |
|
1991 |
Hoequist C, Nolan F. On an application of phonological knowledge in automatic speech recognition Computer Speech & Language. 5: 133-153. DOI: 10.1016/0885-2308(91)90021-H |
0.372 |
|
1990 |
Freij GJ, Fallside F, Hoequist C, Nolan F. Lexical stress estimation and phonological knowledge Computer Speech & Language. 4: 1-15. DOI: 10.1016/0885-2308(90)90020-7 |
0.368 |
|
1988 |
Nolan F. 2.2 Vowels Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 18: 69-74. DOI: 10.1017/S0025100300003650 |
0.315 |
|
1984 |
Nolan F. Phonetic feature definitions: Their integration into phonology and their relation to speech. A case study of the feature NASAL: Pieter van Reenen, Foris Publications, Dordrecht (Holland), 1982. xii + 196 pp Lingua. 64: 238-245. DOI: 10.1016/0024-3841(84)90021-4 |
0.343 |
|
Show low-probability matches. |