Masatoshi Sato, Ph.D.

Affiliations: 
2011 Department of Integrated Studies in Education McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada 
Area:
Bilingual and Multicultural Education, Language and Literature Education
Google:
"Masatoshi Sato"

Parents

Sign in to add mentor
Roy Lyster grad student 2011 McGill
 (Peer interaction and corrective feedback: Proceduralization of grammatical knowledge in classroom settings.)
BETA: Related publications

Publications

You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Sato M, McDonough K, Oyanedel JC. (2020) Data of the interaction mindset questionnaire: An initial exploration. Data in Brief. 31: 106000
Sato M, Storch N. (2020) Context matters: Learner beliefs and interactional behaviors in an EFL vs. ESL context: Language Teaching Research. 136216882092358
Sato M, McDonough K. (2020) Predicting L2 learners’ noticing of L2 errors: Proficiency, language analytical ability, and interaction mindset System. 93: 102301
Sato M, Oyanedel JC. (2019) Survey data of English teachers' beliefs about second language instruction in Chile. Data in Brief. 27: 104702
McDonough K, Sato M. (2019) Promoting EFL students’ accuracy and fluency through interactive practice activities Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. 9: 379-395
Sato M, Loewen S. (2019) Do teachers care about research? The research–pedagogy dialogue Elt Journal. 73: 1-10
Sato M, McDonough K. (2019) Practice is important but how about its quality?: Contextualized practice in the classroom Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 41: 999-1026
Sato M, Oyanedel JC. (2019) “I think that is a better way to teach but …”: EFL teachers’ conflicting beliefs about grammar teaching System. 84: 110-122
Loewen S, Sato M. (2018) Interaction and Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Language Teaching. 51: 285-329
Sato M. (2017) Interaction Mindsets, Interactional Behaviors, and L2 Development: An Affective-Social-Cognitive Model Language Learning. 67: 249-283
See more...