Gerald J. Postema
Affiliations: | University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC |
Area:
PhilosophyGoogle:
"Gerald Postema"Children
Sign in to add traineeMatthew T. Chrisman | grad student | ||
Lorraine Besser-Jones | grad student | 2003 | UNC Chapel Hill |
Yaacov Ben-Shemesh | grad student | 2004 | UNC Chapel Hill |
Colleen Murphy | grad student | 2004 | UNC Chapel Hill |
Matthew Noah Smith | grad student | 1998-2004 | UNC Chapel Hill |
Susanne Sreedhar | grad student | 2005 | UNC Chapel Hill |
Piers N. Turner | grad student | 2009 | UNC Chapel Hill |
Clair Morrissey | grad student | 2010 | UNC Chapel Hill |
Kristen Bell | grad student | 2011 | UNC Chapel Hill |
Daniel M. Layman | grad student | 2014 | UNC Chapel Hill |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Postema GJ. (2014) The soul of justice: Bentham on publicity, law, and the rule of law Bentham's Theory of Law and Public Opinion. 40-62 |
Postema GJ. (2014) Law’s rule: Reflexivity, mutual accountability, and the rule of law Bentham's Theory of Law and Public Opinion. 7-39 |
Postema GJ. (2013) Philosophical Narrative: A Reply to Professor Wolenski Ratio Juris. 26: 139-143 |
Postema GJ. (2012) Custom, normative practice, and the law Duke Law Journal. 62: 707-738 |
Postema GJ. (2010) Sweet Dissonance: Conflict, Consensus, and the Rule of Law The Harvard Review of Philosophy. 17: 36-55 |
Postema GJ. (2010) Law's ethos: Reflections on a public practice of illegality Boston University Law Review. 90: 1847-1868 |
Postema GJ. (2007) Custom in international law: A normative practice account The Nature of Customary Law. 279-306 |
Postema GJ. (2006) Interests, Universal and Particular: Bentham's Utilitarian Theory of Value Utilitas. 18: 109-133 |
Postema GJ. (2006) Whence avidity? Hume's psychology and the origins of justice Synthese. 152: 371-391 |
Postema GJ. (2005) Politics Is About The Grievance Legal Theory. 11: 293-323 |