Angus Gellatly
Affiliations: | Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, England, United Kingdom |
Google:
"Angus Gellatly"
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Camp SJ, Pilling M, Gellatly A. (2017) Object substitution masking and its relationship with visual crowding. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics |
Camp SJ, Pilling M, Argyropoulos I, et al. (2015) The Role of Distractors in Object Substitution Masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance |
Pilling M, Gellatly A, Argyropoulos Y, et al. (2014) Exogenous spatial precuing reliably modulates object processing but not object substitution masking. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 76: 1560-76 |
Skarratt PA, Gellatly AR, Cole GG, et al. (2014) Looming motion primes the visuomotor system. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 40: 566-79 |
Argyropoulos I, Gellatly A, Pilling M, et al. (2013) Set size and mask duration do not interact in object-substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 39: 646-61 |
Guest D, Gellatly A, Pilling M. (2012) Reduced OSM for long duration targets: individuation or items loaded into VSTM? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 38: 1541-53 |
Guest D, Gellatly A, Pilling M. (2011) The effect of spatial competition between object-level representations of target and mask on object substitution masking. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 73: 2528-41 |
Pilling M, Gellatly A. (2011) Visual awareness of objects and their colour. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 73: 2026-43 |
Pilling M, Gellatly A. (2010) Object substitution masking and the object updating hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 17: 737-42 |
Gellatly A, Pilling M, Carter W, et al. (2010) How does target duration affect object substitution masking? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 36: 1267-79 |