Year |
Citation |
Score |
2020 |
van Dijke M, Van Quaquebeke N, Brockner J. In self-defense: Reappraisal buffers the negative impact of low procedural fairness on performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied. PMID 32584086 DOI: 10.1037/Xap0000303 |
0.358 |
|
2020 |
Brockner J, Cremer DD, Dijke Mv, Schutter LD, Holtz B, Hiel AV. Factors Affecting Supervisors’ Enactment of Interpersonal Fairness: The Interactive Relationship between Their Managers’ Informational Fairness and Supervisors’ Sense of Power Journal of Organizational Behavior. DOI: 10.1002/Job.2466 |
0.346 |
|
2019 |
Carter AB, Bobocel DR, Brockner J. When to explain why or how it happened: Tailoring accounts to fit observers' construal level. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied. PMID 31246055 DOI: 10.1037/Xap0000236 |
0.332 |
|
2017 |
Wiesenfeld BM, Reyt J, Brockner J, Trope Y. Construal Level Theory in Organizational Research Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 4: 367-400. DOI: 10.1146/ANNUREV-ORGPSYCH-032516-113115 |
0.611 |
|
2016 |
Brockner J, Wiesenfeld BM. Self-as-object and self-as-subject in the workplace Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 136: 36-46. DOI: 10.1016/J.Obhdp.2016.06.005 |
0.678 |
|
2016 |
Siegel PA, Brockner J, Wiesenfeld BM, Liu Z. Non-Contingent Success Reduces People’s Desire for Processes that Adhere to Principles of Fairness Social Justice Research. 29: 375-401. DOI: 10.1007/S11211-016-0272-Z |
0.723 |
|
2015 |
Bianchi EC, Brockner J, van den Bos K, Seifert M, Moon H, van Dijke M, De Cremer D. Trust in decision-making authorities dictates the form of the interactive relationship between outcome fairness and procedural fairness. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin. 41: 19-34. PMID 25387762 DOI: 10.1177/0146167214556237 |
0.76 |
|
2015 |
Brockner J, Wiesenfeld BM, Siegel PA, Bobocel DR, Liu Z. Riding the Fifth Wave: Organizational Justice as Dependent Variable Research in Organizational Behavior. 35: 103-121. DOI: 10.1016/J.Riob.2015.07.002 |
0.693 |
|
2015 |
Zhao G, Chen Y, Brockner J. What influences managers' procedural fairness towards their subordinates? The role of subordinates' trustworthiness Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 59: 96-112. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jesp.2015.04.002 |
0.323 |
|
2014 |
Brockner J, Senior D, Welch W. Corporate Volunteerism, the Experience of Self-Integrity, and Organizational Commitment: Evidence from the Field Social Justice Research. 27: 1-23. DOI: 10.1007/S11211-014-0204-8 |
0.358 |
|
2012 |
Schweinsberg M, Seifert M, Moon H, Shannon LM, Brockner J, Bianchi E. Status-Sensitivity: Why High Status People are More Sensitive to Psychological Contract Violations Academy of Management Proceedings. 2012: 11928. DOI: 10.5465/AMBPP.2012.11928ABSTRACT |
0.705 |
|
2012 |
Wiesenfeld BM, Brockner J. On the reciprocal relationship between basic and applied psychological theory Organizational Psychology Review. 2: 172-182. DOI: 10.1177/2041386611428501 |
0.657 |
|
2012 |
Brockner J, Bianchi EC. Breaking the Vicious Cycle of Low Trust in Decision-Making Authorities Restoring Trust in Organizations and Leaders: Enduring Challenges and Emerging Answers. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756087.003.0013 |
0.768 |
|
2012 |
Bianchi EC, Brockner J. In the eyes of the beholder? The role of dispositional trust in judgments of procedural and interactional fairness Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 118: 46-59. DOI: 10.1016/J.Obhdp.2011.12.005 |
0.768 |
|
2010 |
De Cremer D, Brockner J, Fishman A, van Dijke M, van Olffen W, Mayer DM. When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderating effect of uncertainty. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 95: 291-304. PMID 20230070 DOI: 10.1037/A0017866 |
0.353 |
|
2010 |
SIEGEL PA, BROCKNER J, WIESENFELD BM. HEDGING ONE'S BETS: UNCERTAINTY ABOUT CONTINUED SUCCESS REDUCES THE DESIRE FOR PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2010: 1-6. DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2010.54493448 |
0.611 |
|
2009 |
Brockner J, Wiesenfeld BM, Diekmann KA. 4 Towards a “Fairer” Conception of Process Fairness: Why, When and How More may not Always be Better than Less The Academy of Management Annals. 3: 183-216. DOI: 10.1080/19416520903047228 |
0.68 |
|
2008 |
Brockner J, De Cremer D, Fishman AY, Spiegel S. When does high procedural fairness reduce self-evaluations following unfavorable outcomes?: The moderating effect of prevention focus Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 44: 187-200. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jesp.2007.03.002 |
0.361 |
|
2007 |
Brockner J, Fishman AY, Reb J, Goldman B, Spiegel S, Garden C. Procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and judgments of an authority's responsibility. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 92: 1657-71. PMID 18020803 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1657 |
0.316 |
|
2007 |
Wiesenfeld BM, Swann WB, Brockner J, Bartel CA. Is More Fairness Always Preferred? Self-Esteem Moderates Reactions to Procedural Justice Academy of Management Journal. 50: 1235-1253. DOI: 10.5465/Amj.2007.20159922 |
0.701 |
|
2005 |
Siegel PA, Post C, Brockner J, Fishman AY, Garden C. The moderating influence of procedural fairness on the relationship between work-life conflict and organizational commitment. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 90: 13-24. PMID 15641887 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.13 |
0.329 |
|
2005 |
Brockner J, De Cremer D, van den Bos K, Chen Y. The influence of interdependent self-construal on procedural fairness effects Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 96: 155-167. DOI: 10.1016/J.Obhdp.2004.11.001 |
0.374 |
|
2005 |
Siegel PA, Brockner J. Individual and organizational consequences of CEO claimed handicapping: What’s good for the CEO may not be so good for the firm Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 96: 1-22. DOI: 10.1016/J.Obhdp.2004.08.003 |
0.351 |
|
2004 |
Brockner J, Higgins ET, Low MB. Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process Journal of Business Venturing. 19: 203-220. DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00007-7 |
0.332 |
|
2003 |
Flynn FJ, Brockner J. It's different to give than to receive: predictors of givers' and receivers' reactions to favor exchange. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 88: 1034-45. PMID 14640814 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1034 |
0.317 |
|
2003 |
Chen Y, Brockner J, Greenberg J. When is it “a pleasure to do business with you?” The effects of relative status, outcome favorability, and procedural fairness Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 92: 1-21. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00062-1 |
0.322 |
|
2003 |
Brockner J, Heuer L, Magner N, Folger R, Umphress E, van den Bos K, Vermunt R, Magner M, Siegel P. High procedural fairness heightens the effect of outcome favorability on self-evaluations: An attributional analysis Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 91: 51-68. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00531-9 |
0.342 |
|
2002 |
Brockner J. Making Sense of Procedural Fairness: How High Procedural Fairness Can Reduce or Heighten the Influence of Outcome Favorability Academy of Management Review. 27: 58-76. DOI: 10.5465/Amr.2002.5922363 |
0.318 |
|
2001 |
Wiesenfeld BM, Brockner J, Petzall B, Wolf R, Bailey J. Stress and coping among layoff survivors: A self-affirmation analysis Anxiety, Stress & Coping. 14: 15-34. DOI: 10.1080/10615800108248346 |
0.698 |
|
2001 |
Brockner J, Higgins ET. Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 86: 35-66. DOI: 10.1006/Obhd.2001.2972 |
0.304 |
|
2000 |
Wiesenfeld BM, Brockner J, Thibault V. Procedural Fairness, Managers' Self-Esteem, and Managerial Behaviors Following a Layoff. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 83: 1-32. PMID 10973781 DOI: 10.1006/Obhd.2000.2894 |
0.708 |
|
2000 |
Garonzik R, Brockner J, Siegel PA. Identifying international assignees at risk for premature departure: the interactive effect of outcome favorability and procedural fairness. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 85: 13-20. PMID 10740952 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.13 |
0.349 |
|
1999 |
Wiesenfeld BM, Brockner J, Martin C. A Self-Affirmation Analysis of Survivors' Reactions to Unfair Organizational Downsizings Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 35: 441-460. DOI: 10.1006/Jesp.1999.1389 |
0.678 |
|
1998 |
Brockner J, Heuer L, Siegel PA, Wiesenfeld B, Martin C, Grover S, Reed T, Bjorgvinsson S. The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: converging evidence from five studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 75: 394-407. PMID 9731315 DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.394 |
0.7 |
|
1997 |
Brockner J, Siegel PA, Daly JP, Tyler T, Martin C. When Trust Matters: The Moderating Effect of Outcome Favorability Administrative Science Quarterly. 42: 558. DOI: 10.2307/2393738 |
0.331 |
|
1996 |
Brockner J, Wiesenfeld BM. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin. 120: 189-208. PMID 8831296 DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.189 |
0.681 |
|
1995 |
Brockner J, Wiesenfeld BM, Martin CL. Decision Frame, Procedural Justice, and Survivors′ Reactions to Job Layoffs Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 63: 59-68. DOI: 10.1006/Obhd.1995.1061 |
0.691 |
|
1993 |
Brockner J, Kim DH. Factors Affecting Stayers' Job Satisfaction in Response to a Coworker Who Departs for a Better Job1 Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 23: 1659-1684. DOI: 10.1111/J.1559-1816.1993.Tb01060.X |
0.321 |
|
1993 |
Brockner J, Wiesenfeld BM, Reed T, Grover S, Martin C. Interactive effect of job content and context on the reactions of layoff survivors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 64: 187-197. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.187 |
0.668 |
|
1993 |
Bies RJ, Martin CL, Brockner J. Just laid off, but still a ?good citizen?? only if the process is fair Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. 6: 227-238. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01419446 |
0.304 |
|
1993 |
Brockner J, Grover S, O'Malley MN, Reed TF, Glynn MA. Threat of future layoffs, self-esteem, and survivors' reactions: Evidence from the laboratory and the field Strategic Management Journal. 14: 153-166. DOI: 10.1002/Smj.4250140912 |
0.335 |
|
1992 |
Brockner J. The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress Academy of Management Review. 17: 39-61. DOI: 10.5465/Amr.1992.4279568 |
0.308 |
|
1992 |
Brockner J, Tyler TR, Cooper-Schneider R. The Influence of Prior Commitment to an Institution on Reactions to Perceived Unfairness: The Higher They Are, The Harder They Fall Administrative Science Quarterly. 37: 241. DOI: 10.2307/2393223 |
0.325 |
|
1990 |
Brockner J, DeWitt RL, Grover S, Reed T. When it is especially important to explain why: Factors affecting the relationship between managers' explanations of a layoff and survivors' reactions to the layoff Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 26: 389-407. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(90)90065-T |
0.325 |
|
1987 |
Brockner J, Grover S, Reed T, DeWitt R, O'Malley M. Survivors' Reactions to Layoffs: We Get by with a Little Help for Our Friends Administrative Science Quarterly. 32: 526. DOI: 10.2307/2392882 |
0.317 |
|
1987 |
Brockner J, Derr WR, Laing WN. Self-esteem and reactions to negative feedback: Toward greater generalizability Journal of Research in Personality. 21: 318-333. DOI: 10.1016/0092-6566(87)90014-6 |
0.306 |
|
1986 |
Brockner J, Houser R, Birnbaum G, Lloyd K, Deitcher J, Nathanson S, Rubin JZ. Escalation of Commitment to an Ineffective Course of Action: The Effect of Feedback Having Negative Implications for Self-Identity Administrative Science Quarterly. 31: 109. DOI: 10.2307/2392768 |
0.331 |
|
1986 |
Brockner J, Lloyd K. Self-esteem and likability: Separating fact from fantasy Journal of Research in Personality. 20: 496-508. DOI: 10.1016/0092-6566(86)90128-5 |
0.305 |
|
1985 |
Brockner J, Davy J, Carter C. Layoffs, self-esteem, and survivor guilt: Motivational, affective, and attitudinal consequences Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 36: 229-244. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(85)90014-7 |
0.343 |
|
1985 |
Brockner J, Elkind M. Self-esteem and reactance: Further evidence of attitudinal and motivational consequences Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 21: 346-361. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(85)90035-6 |
0.333 |
|
1982 |
Brockner J, Rubin JZ, Fine J, Hamilton TP, Thomas B, Turetsky B. Factors affecting entrapment in escalating conflicts: The importance of timing Journal of Research in Personality. 16: 247-266. DOI: 10.1016/0092-6566(82)90080-0 |
0.335 |
|
Show low-probability matches. |