Year |
Citation |
Score |
2016 |
Paganini M, Leidner AK, Geller G, Turner W, Wegmann M. The role of space agencies in remotely sensed essential biodiversity variables Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2: 132-140. DOI: 10.1002/Rse2.29 |
0.41 |
|
2016 |
Pettorelli N, Wegmann M, Skidmore A, Mücher S, Dawson TP, Fernandez M, Lucas R, Schaepman ME, Wang T, O'Connor B, Jongman RH, Kempeneers P, Sonnenschein R, Leidner AK, Böhm M, et al. Framing the concept of satellite remote sensing essential biodiversity variables: challenges and future directions Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2: 122-131. DOI: 10.1002/Rse2.15 |
0.375 |
|
2015 |
Rose RA, Byler D, Eastman JR, Fleishman E, Geller G, Goetz S, Guild L, Hamilton H, Hansen M, Headley R, Hewson J, Horning N, Kaplin BA, Laporte N, Leidner A, et al. Ten ways remote sensing can contribute to conservation. Conservation Biology : the Journal of the Society For Conservation Biology. 29: 350-9. PMID 25319024 DOI: 10.1111/Cobi.12397 |
0.492 |
|
2015 |
Buchanan GM, Brink AB, Leidner AK, Rose R, Wegmann M. Advancing terrestrial conservation through remote sensing Ecological Informatics. 30: 318-321. DOI: 10.1016/J.Ecoinf.2015.05.005 |
0.387 |
|
2015 |
Turner W, Rondinini C, Pettorelli N, Mora B, Leidner AK, Szantoi Z, Buchanan G, Dech S, Dwyer J, Herold M, Koh LP, Leimgruber P, Taubenboeck H, Wegmann M, Wikelski M, et al. Free and open-access satellite data are key to biodiversity conservation Biological Conservation. 182: 173-176. DOI: 10.1016/J.Biocon.2014.11.048 |
0.407 |
|
2013 |
Staudt A, Leidner AK, Howard J, Brauman KA, Dukes JS, Hansen LJ, Paukert C, Sabo J, Solórzano LA. The added complications of climate change: Understanding and managing biodiversity and ecosystems Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 11: 494-501. DOI: 10.1890/120275 |
0.345 |
|
2013 |
Leidner AK, Brink AB, Szantoi Z. Leveraging remote sensing for conservation decision making Eos. 94: 508. DOI: 10.1002/2013Eo520006 |
0.369 |
|
2012 |
Neel MC, Leidner AK, Haines A, Goble DD, Scott JM. By the numbers: How is recovery defined by the US endangered species act? Bioscience. 62: 646-657. DOI: 10.1525/Bio.2012.62.7.7 |
0.43 |
|
2011 |
Leidner AK, Haddad NM. Combining measures of dispersal to identify conservation strategies in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology : the Journal of the Society For Conservation Biology. 25: 1022-31. PMID 21848964 DOI: 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2011.01720.X |
0.561 |
|
2011 |
Leidner AK, Neel MC. Taxonomic and geographic patterns of decline for threatened and endangered species in the United States. Conservation Biology : the Journal of the Society For Conservation Biology. 25: 716-25. PMID 21672024 DOI: 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2011.01689.X |
0.439 |
|
2010 |
Leidner AK, Haddad NM, Lovejoy TE. Does tropical forest fragmentation increase long-term variability of butterfly communities? Plos One. 5: e9534. PMID 20224772 DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pone.0009534 |
0.55 |
|
2010 |
Leidner AK, Haddad NM. Natural, not urban, barriers define population structure for a coastal endemic butterfly Conservation Genetics. 11: 2311-2320. DOI: 10.1007/S10592-010-0117-5 |
0.548 |
|
2006 |
Hess GR, Bartel RA, Leidner AK, Rosenfeld KM, Rubino MJ, Snider SB, Ricketts TH. Effectiveness of biodiversity indicators varies with extent, grain, and region Biological Conservation. 132: 448-457. DOI: 10.1016/J.Biocon.2006.04.037 |
0.341 |
|
Low-probability matches (unlikely to be authored by this person) |
2009 |
Leidner A. Jumping into the policy puddle Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 7: 555-556. DOI: 10.1890/1540-9295-7.10.555 |
0.183 |
|
Hide low-probability matches. |