Sean M. Burgess - Publications

Affiliations: 
1999- Molecular and Cellular Biolgy University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 

31 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2024 Olaya I, Burgess SM, Rog O. Formation and resolution of meiotic chromosome entanglements and interlocks. Journal of Cell Science. 137. PMID 38985540 DOI: 10.1242/jcs.262004  0.426
2022 Olaya I, Burgess SM. When the anchor's away, meiotic telomeres go astray. Developmental Cell. 57: 1563-1565. PMID 35820392 DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.06.014  0.412
2022 Newman TAC, Beltran B, McGehee JM, Elnatan D, Cahoon CK, Paddy MR, Chu DB, Spakowitz AJ, Burgess SM. Diffusion and distal linkages govern interchromosomal dynamics during meiotic prophase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 119: e2115883119. PMID 35302885 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2115883119  0.687
2022 Komachi K, Burgess SM. The Nup2 meiotic-autonomous region relieves inhibition of Nup60 to promote progression of meiosis and sporulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. PMID 35302609 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac045  0.551
2021 Imai Y, Olaya I, Sakai N, Burgess SM. Meiotic Chromosome Dynamics in Zebrafish. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 9: 757445. PMID 34692709 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.757445  0.554
2021 Blokhina YP, Frees MA, Nguyen A, Sharifi M, Chu DB, Bispo K, Olaya I, Draper BW, Burgess SM. Rad21l1 cohesin subunit is dispensable for spermatogenesis but not oogenesis in zebrafish. Plos Genetics. 17: e1009127. PMID 34138874 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009127  0.463
2020 Blokhina YP, Olaya I, Burgess SM. Preparation of Meiotic Chromosome Spreads from Zebrafish Spermatocytes. Journal of Visualized Experiments : Jove. PMID 32202531 DOI: 10.3791/60671  0.575
2019 Pouokam M, Cruz B, Burgess S, Segal MR, Vazquez M, Arsuaga J. The Rabl configuration limits topological entanglement of chromosomes in budding yeast. Scientific Reports. 9: 6795. PMID 31043625 DOI: 10.1038/S41598-019-42967-4  0.508
2019 Blokhina YP, Nguyen AD, Draper BW, Burgess SM. The telomere bouquet is a hub where meiotic double-strand breaks, synapsis, and stable homolog juxtaposition are coordinated in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Plos Genetics. 15: e1007730. PMID 30653507 DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pgen.1007730  0.582
2018 Newman T, Beltran BG, McGehee J, Cahoon C, Elnatan D, Chu D, Burgess S, Spakowitz A. Long-Range Structural Changes in the Meiotic Nucleus Revealed by Changes in Stress Communication Along the Chromosome Biophysical Journal. 114: 30a. DOI: 10.1016/J.Bpj.2017.11.212  0.53
2017 Chu DB, Gromova T, Burgess SM. The Nucleoporin Nup2 Contains a Meiotic-Autonomous Region That Promotes the Dynamic Chromosome Events of Meiosis. Genetics. PMID 28455351 DOI: 10.1534/Genetics.116.194555  0.621
2016 Chu DB, Burgess SM. A Computational Approach to Estimating Nondisjunction Frequency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 (Bethesda, Md.). 6: 669-82. PMID 26747203 DOI: 10.1534/G3.115.024380  0.517
2013 Lui DY, Cahoon CK, Burgess SM. Multiple opposing constraints govern chromosome interactions during meiosis. Plos Genetics. 9: e1003197. PMID 23341780 DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pgen.1003197  0.624
2011 Ho HC, Burgess SM. Pch2 acts through Xrs2 and Tel1/ATM to modulate interhomolog bias and checkpoint function during meiosis. Plos Genetics. 7: e1002351. PMID 22072981 DOI: 10.1371/Journal.Pgen.1002351  0.594
2010 Wu HY, Ho HC, Burgess SM. Mek1 kinase governs outcomes of meiotic recombination and the checkpoint response. Current Biology : Cb. 20: 1707-16. PMID 20888230 DOI: 10.1016/J.Cub.2010.09.016  0.509
2009 Lui D, Burgess SM. Measurement of spatial proximity and accessibility of chromosomal loci in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using Cre/loxP site-specific recombination. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.). 557: 55-63. PMID 19799176 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-527-5_5  0.58
2008 Mell JC, Komachi K, Hughes O, Burgess S. Cooperative Interactions Between Pairs of Homologous Chromatids During Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics. 179: 1125-1127. PMID 18558657 DOI: 10.1534/Genetics.108.088567  0.521
2008 Mell JC, Wienholz BL, Salem A, Burgess SM. Sites of recombination are local determinants of meiotic homolog pairing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 179: 773-84. PMID 18505886 DOI: 10.1534/Genetics.107.077727  0.562
2006 Wu HY, Burgess SM. Two Distinct Surveillance Mechanisms Monitor Meiotic Chromosome Metabolism in Budding Yeast Current Biology. 16: 2473-2479. PMID 17174924 DOI: 10.1016/J.Cub.2006.10.069  0.552
2006 Lui DY, Peoples-Holst TL, Mell JC, Wu HY, Dean EW, Burgess SM. Analysis of close stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 173: 1207-22. PMID 16648640 DOI: 10.1534/Genetics.105.050658  0.59
2006 Wu HY, Burgess SM. Ndj1, a telomere-associated protein, promotes meiotic recombination in budding yeast Molecular and Cellular Biology. 26: 3683-3694. PMID 16648465 DOI: 10.1128/Mcb.26.10.3683-3694.2006  0.551
2005 Peoples-Holst TL, Burgess SM. Multiple branches of the meiotic recombination pathway contribute independently to homolog pairing and stable juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast. Genes & Development. 19: 863-74. PMID 15805472 DOI: 10.1101/Gad.1293605  0.603
2004 Burgess SM. Homolog pairing in S. pombe: The ends are the means Molecular Cell. 13: 766-768. PMID 15053869 DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00152-2  0.564
2002 Peoples TL, Dean E, Gonzalez O, Lambourne L, Burgess SM. Close, stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast is dependent on meiotic recombination, occurs independently of synapsis, and is distinct from DSB-independent pairing contacts. Genes & Development. 16: 1682-95. PMID 12101126 DOI: 10.1101/Gad.983802  0.613
2002 Burgess SM. Homologous chromosome associations and nuclear order in meiotic and mitotically dividing cells of budding yeast. Advances in Genetics. 46: 49-90. PMID 11931237 DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2660(02)46004-X  0.591
1999 Burgess SM, Kleckner N. Collisions between yeast chromosomal loci in vivo are governed by three layers of organization. Genes & Development. 13: 1871-83. PMID 10421638 DOI: 10.1101/Gad.13.14.1871  0.685
1999 Burgess SM, Kleckner N, Weiner BM. Somatic pairing of homologs in budding yeast: existence and modulation. Genes & Development. 13: 1627-41. PMID 10385630 DOI: 10.1101/Gad.13.12.1627  0.684
1999 Burgess SM, Ajimura M, Kleckner N. GCN5-dependent histone H3 acetylation and RPD3-dependent histone H4 deacetylation have distinct, opposing effects on IME2 transcription, during meiosis and during vegetative growth, in budding yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 96: 6835-40. PMID 10359799 DOI: 10.1073/Pnas.96.12.6835  0.574
1993 Burgess SM, Guthrie C. A mechanism to enhance mRNA splicing fidelity: the RNA-dependent ATPase Prp16 governs usage of a discard pathway for aberrant lariat intermediates. Cell. 73: 1377-91. PMID 8324826 DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90363-U  0.523
1993 Burgess SM, Guthrie C. Beat the clock: paradigms for NTPases in the maintenance of biological fidelity Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 18: 381-384. PMID 8256287 DOI: 10.1016/0968-0004(93)90094-4  0.555
1990 Burgess S, Couto JR, Guthrie C. A putative ATP binding protein influences the fidelity of branchpoint recognition in yeast splicing. Cell. 60: 705-17. PMID 2138057 DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90086-T  0.523
Show low-probability matches.