Parents
Sign in to add mentor| Jonathan Spence | grad student | 1998 | Yale | |
| (“Between Heaven and Modernity: The Late Qing and Early Republic (Re)Construction of Suchou Urban Space”) | ||||
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
|
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
| Djaïleb L, Armstrong WR, Thompson D, et al. (2023) Presurgical Ga-PSMA-11 Positron Emission Tomography for Biochemical Recurrence Risk Assessment: A Follow-up Analysis of a Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial. European Urology |
| Langlais CS, Graff RE, Van Blarigan EL, et al. (2023) Post-diagnostic health behaviour scores and risk of prostate cancer progression and mortality. British Journal of Cancer |
| Carroll P. (2022) Gleason Grade 1 Prostate Cancer Volume at Biopsy Is Associated With Upgrading, but Not Adverse Pathology or Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results From a Large Institutional Cohort. Reply. The Journal of Urology. 209: 73 |
| Beckmann K, Santaolalla A, Sugimoto M, et al. (2022) Risk of progression following a negative biopsy in prostate cancer active surveillance. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases |
| Remmers S, Helleman J, Nieboer D, et al. (2022) Active Surveillance for Men Younger than 60 Years or with Intermediate-risk Localized Prostate Cancer. Descriptive Analyses of Clinical Practice in the Movember GAP3 Initiative. European Urology Open Science. 41: 126-133 |
| Olivier J, Li W, Nieboer D, et al. (2022) Prostate Cancer Patients Under Active Surveillance with a Suspicious Magnetic Resonance Imaging Finding Are at Increased Risk of Needing Treatment: Results of the Movember Foundation's Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium. European Urology Open Science. 35: 59-67 |
| Waisman Malaret AJ, Chang P, Newcomb L, et al. (2021) Effect of Diagnostic Biopsy Practice Location on Grade/Volume Reclassification in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Analysis from the Canary PASS Cohort. Urology Practice. 8: 576-582 |
| Beckmann K, Santaolalla A, Helleman J, et al. (2021) Comparison of Characteristics, Follow-up and Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer According to Ethnicity in the GAP3 Global Consortium Database. European Urology Open Science. 34: 47-54 |
| Waisman Malaret AJ, Chang P, Zhu K, et al. (2021) Evaluating the Outcomes of Active Surveillance in Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer: Prospective Results From the Canary PASS Cohort. The Journal of Urology. 101097JU000000000000 |
| Vertosick EA, Zappala S, Punnen S, et al. (2021) Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Discrimination of the Four Kallikrein Panel Associated With the Inclusion of Prostate Volume. Urology. 157: 102-106 |