| Year |
Citation |
Score |
| 2024 |
Hudde A, Horne W, Adams J, Gidron N. How warm are political interactions? A new measure of affective fractionalization. Plos One. 19: e0294401. PMID 38743720 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294401 |
0.498 |
|
| 2022 |
Adams JF, Böhmelt T, Ezrow L, Schleiter P. Backlash policy diffusion to populists in power. Plos One. 17: e0273951. PMID 36149847 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273951 |
0.824 |
|
| 2020 |
Adams J, Weschle S, Wlezien C. Elite Interactions and Voters’ Perceptions of Parties’ Policy Positions American Journal of Political Science. DOI: 10.1111/Ajps.12510 |
0.553 |
|
| 2020 |
Adams J, Bernardi L, Wlezien C. Social Welfare Policy Outputs and Governing Parties’ Left-Right Images: Do Voters Respond? The Journal of Politics. 82: 1161-1165. DOI: 10.1086/707523 |
0.696 |
|
| 2019 |
ADAMS J, BERNARDI L, EZROW L, GORDON OB, LIU T, PHILLIPS MC. A problem with empirical studies of party policy shifts: Alternative measures of party shifts are uncorrelated European Journal of Political Research. 58: 1234-1244. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12324 |
0.811 |
|
| 2019 |
Bernardi L, Adams J. Governing Coalition Partners’ Images Shift in Parallel but Do Not Converge The Journal of Politics. 81: 1500-1511. DOI: 10.1086/704700 |
0.673 |
|
| 2017 |
Bernardi L, Adams J. Does Government Support Respond to Governments’ Social Welfare Rhetoric or their Spending? An Analysis of Government Support in Britain, Spain and the United States British Journal of Political Science. 49: 1407-1429. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123417000199 |
0.446 |
|
| 2017 |
Adams J, Engstrom E, Joeston D, Stone W, Rogowski J, Shor B. Do Moderate Voters Weigh Candidates’ Ideologies? Voters’ Decision Rules in the 2010 Congressional Elections Political Behavior. 39: 205-227. DOI: 10.1007/S11109-016-9355-7 |
0.648 |
|
| 2015 |
Adams J, Ezrow L, Wlezien C. The Company You Keep: How Voters Infer Party Positions on European Integration from Governing Coalition Arrangements American Journal of Political Science. DOI: 10.1111/Ajps.12231 |
0.827 |
|
| 2015 |
Fortunato D, Adams J. How voters' perceptions of junior coalition partners depend on the prime minister's position European Journal of Political Research. 54: 601-621. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12094 |
0.709 |
|
| 2015 |
Adams J. On the relationship between (parties’ and voters’) issue attention and their issue positions: response to Dowding, Hindmoor and Martin Journal of Public Policy. 23-29. DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X1500015X |
0.377 |
|
| 2014 |
Adams J, Ezrow L, Somer-Topcu Z. Do voters respond to party manifestos or to a wider information environment? An analysis of mass-elite linkages on European integration American Journal of Political Science. 58: 967-978. DOI: 10.1111/Ajps.12115 |
0.811 |
|
| 2014 |
Adams J, Merrill S. Candidates’ policy strategies in primary elections: does strategic voting by the primary electorate matter? Public Choice. 160: 7-24. DOI: 10.1007/S11127-013-0123-5 |
0.565 |
|
| 2013 |
Abney R, Adams J, Clark M, Easton M, Ezrow L, Kosmidis S, Neundorf A. When does valence matter? Heightened valence effects for governing parties during election campaigns Party Politics. 19: 61-82. DOI: 10.1177/1354068810395057 |
0.81 |
|
| 2013 |
Adams J, Ezrow L, Merrill S, Somer-Topcu Z. Does collective responsibility for performance alter party strategies? Policy-seeking parties in proportional systems British Journal of Political Science. 43: 1-23. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123412000142 |
0.831 |
|
| 2013 |
Adams J, Merrill S. Policy-seeking candidates who value the valence attributes of the winner Public Choice. 155: 139-161. DOI: 10.1007/S11127-011-9845-4 |
0.535 |
|
| 2012 |
Adams J, Green J, Milazzo C. Has the British Public Depolarized Along With Political Elites? An American Perspective on British Public Opinion Comparative Political Studies. 45: 507-530. DOI: 10.1177/0010414011421764 |
0.7 |
|
| 2012 |
Adams J. Causes and Electoral Consequences of Party Policy Shifts in Multiparty Elections: Theoretical Results and Empirical Evidence Annual Review of Political Science. 15: 401-419. DOI: 10.1146/Annurev-Polisci-031710-101450 |
0.694 |
|
| 2012 |
Adams J, Ezrow L, Leiter D. Partisan Sorting and Niche Parties in Europe West European Politics. 35: 1272-1294. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2012.713746 |
0.792 |
|
| 2012 |
Milazzo C, Adams J, Green J. Are Voter Decision Rules Endogenous to Parties’ Policy Strategies? A Model with Applications to Elite Depolarization in Post-Thatcher Britain The Journal of Politics. 74: 262-276. DOI: 10.1017/S0022381611001575 |
0.713 |
|
| 2012 |
Adams J, De Vries CE, Leiter D. Subconstituency reactions to elite depolarization in the Netherlands: An analysis of the Dutch public's policy beliefs and partisan loyalties, 1986-98 British Journal of Political Science. 42: 81-105. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123411000214 |
0.66 |
|
| 2012 |
Adams J, Green J, Milazzo C. Who moves? Elite and mass-level depolarization in Britain, 1987–2001 Electoral Studies. 31: 643-655. DOI: 10.1016/J.Electstud.2012.07.008 |
0.628 |
|
| 2011 |
Adams J, Ezrow L, Somer-Topcu Z. Is Anybody Listening? Evidence That Voters Do Not Respond to European Parties' Policy Statements During Elections American Journal of Political Science. 55: 370-382. DOI: 10.1111/J.1540-5907.2010.00489.X |
0.851 |
|
| 2011 |
Adams J, Merrill S, Simas EN, Stone WJ. When candidates value good character: A spatial model with applications to congressional elections Journal of Politics. 73: 17-30. DOI: 10.1017/S0022381610000836 |
0.656 |
|
| 2010 |
Adams J. Voting for Policy, Not Parties: How Voters Compensate for Power Sharing . By Orit Kedar. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 240p. $85.00. Perspectives On Politics. 8: 1257-1258. DOI: 10.1017/S153759271000280X |
0.53 |
|
| 2010 |
Adams J, Brunell TL, Grofman B, Merrill S. Why candidate divergence should be expected to be just as great (or even greater) in competitive seats as in non-competitive ones Public Choice. 145: 417-433. DOI: 10.1007/S11127-009-9573-1 |
0.546 |
|
| 2009 |
Adams J, Haupt AB, Stoll H. What moves parties? the role of public opinion and global economic conditions in Western Europe Comparative Political Studies. 42: 611-639. DOI: 10.1177/0010414008328637 |
0.73 |
|
| 2009 |
Adams J, Somer-Topcu Z. Moderate Now, Win Votes Later: The Electoral Consequences of Parties' Policy Shifts in 25 Postwar Democracies The Journal of Politics. 71: 678-692. DOI: 10.1017/S0022381609090537 |
0.713 |
|
| 2009 |
Adams J, Ezrow L. Who do European parties represent? How western European parties represent the policy preferences of opinion leaders Journal of Politics. 71: 206-223. DOI: 10.1017/S0022381608090130 |
0.847 |
|
| 2009 |
Adams J, Somer-Topcu Z. Policy Adjustment by Parties in Response to Rival Parties' Policy Shifts: Spatial Theory and the Dynamics of Party Competition in Twenty-Five Post-War Democracies British Journal of Political Science. 39: 825-846. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123409000635 |
0.721 |
|
| 2009 |
Adams J, Merrill S. Policy-Seeking Parties in a Parliamentary Democracy with Proportional Representation: A Valence-Uncertainty Model British Journal of Political Science. 39: 539-558. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123408000562 |
0.651 |
|
| 2008 |
Adams J, Merrill S. Candidate and Party Strategies in Two‐Stage Elections Beginning with a Primary American Journal of Political Science. 52: 344-359. DOI: 10.1111/J.1540-5907.2008.00316.X |
0.604 |
|
| 2008 |
Adams J, Mayer AK. Condorcet efficiency with adaptive parties in a spatial model Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 48: 1298-1307. DOI: 10.1016/J.Mcm.2008.05.035 |
0.597 |
|
| 2007 |
Merrill S, Adams J. The effects of alternative power-sharing arrangements: Do “moderating” institutions moderate party strategies and government policy outputs? Public Choice. 131: 413-434. DOI: 10.1007/S11127-006-9123-Z |
0.68 |
|
| 2006 |
Adams J, Clark M, Ezrow L, Glasgow G. Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties' policy shifts, 1976-1998 American Journal of Political Science. 50: 513-529. DOI: 10.1111/J.1540-5907.2006.00199.X |
0.856 |
|
| 2006 |
Adams J, Merrill S. Why Small, Centrist Third Parties Motivate Policy Divergence by Major Parties American Political Science Review. 100: 403-417. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055406062265 |
0.724 |
|
| 2006 |
Bishin BG, Dow JK, Adams J. Does democracy "suffer" from diversity? Issue representation and diversity in senate elections Public Choice. 129: 201-215. DOI: 10.1007/S11127-006-9024-1 |
0.574 |
|
| 2006 |
Adams J, Dow J, Merrill S. The political consequences of alienation-based and indifference-based voter abstention: Applications to Presidential Elections Political Behavior. 28: 65-86. DOI: 10.1007/S11109-005-9002-1 |
0.636 |
|
| 2005 |
Adams J, Merrill S. Candidates’ policy platforms and election outcomes: The three faces of policy representation European Journal of Political Research. 44: 899-918. DOI: 10.1111/J.1475-6765.2005.00252.X |
0.671 |
|
| 2005 |
Adams J, Merrill S, Grofman B. Does France's Two-Ballot Presidential Election System Alter Candidates’ Policy Strategies? A Spatial Analysis of Office-Seeking Candidates in the 1988 Presidential Election1 French Politics. 3: 98-123. DOI: 10.1057/Palgrave.Fp.8200074 |
0.465 |
|
| 2004 |
Adams J, Bishin BG, Dow JK. Representation in congressional campaigns: Evidence for discounting/directional voting in U.S. senate elections Journal of Politics. 66: 348-373. DOI: 10.1111/J.1468-2508.2004.00155.X |
0.667 |
|
| 2004 |
Adams J, Clark M, Ezrow L, Glasgow G. Understanding change and stability in party ideologies: Do parties respond to public opinion or to past election results? British Journal of Political Science. 34: 589-610. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123404000201 |
0.833 |
|
| 2003 |
Adams J, Merrill SM. Voter Turnout and Candidate Strategies in American Elections The Journal of Politics. 65: 161-189. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2508.T01-1-00008 |
0.616 |
|
| 2002 |
Merrill S, Adams J. Centrifugal Incentives in Multi-Candidate Elections Journal of Theoretical Politics. 14: 275-300. DOI: 10.1177/095169280201400301 |
0.657 |
|
| 2001 |
Merrill S, Grofman B, Adams J. Assimilation and contrast effects in voter projections of party locations: Evidence from Norway, France, and the USA European Journal of Political Research. 40: 199-221. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00594 |
0.615 |
|
| 2001 |
Adams J. A theory of spatial competition with biased voters: Party policies viewed temporally and comparatively British Journal of Political Science. 31: 121-158. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123401000060 |
0.691 |
|
| 2000 |
Adams J, Merrill S. Spatial Models of Candidate Competition and the 1988 French Presidential Election: Are Presidential Candidates Vote‐Maximizers? The Journal of Politics. 62: 729-756. DOI: 10.1111/0022-3816.00031 |
0.556 |
|
| 2000 |
Adams J. Multicandidate Equilibrium in American Elections Public Choice. 103: 297-325. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005038222082 |
0.625 |
|
| 1999 |
Adams J, Merril S. Modeling Party Strategies and Policy Representation in Multiparty Elections: Why Are Strategies so Extreme? American Journal of Political Science. 43: 765. DOI: 10.2307/2991834 |
0.653 |
|
| 1999 |
Adams J, Merrill S. Party policy equilibrium for alternative spatial voting models: An application to the Norwegian storting European Journal of Political Research. 36: 235-255. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00469 |
0.569 |
|
| 1999 |
Adams J. An Assessment of Voting Systems under the Proximity and Directional Models of the Vote Public Choice. 98: 131-151. DOI: 10.1023/A:1018387309824 |
0.428 |
|
| 1999 |
Adams J. Multiparty Spatial Competition with Probabilistic Voting Public Choice. 99: 259-274. DOI: 10.1023/A:1018362719595 |
0.538 |
|
| 1999 |
Adams J. Policy divergence in multicandidate probabilistic spatial voting Public Choice. 100: 103-122. DOI: 10.1023/A:1018301007077 |
0.587 |
|
| 1998 |
Adams J. Partisan Voting and Multiparty Spatial Competition Journal of Theoretical Politics. 10: 5-31. DOI: 10.1177/0951692898010001001 |
0.622 |
|
| 1997 |
Adams J. Condorcet Efficiency and the Behavioral Model of the Vote The Journal of Politics. 59: 1252-1263. DOI: 10.2307/2998600 |
0.527 |
|
| Show low-probability matches. |