Stephen Stark - Publications

Affiliations: 
Psychology University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States 

65 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2022 Tu N, Joo S, Lee P, Stark S. Comparison of parameter estimation approaches for multi-unidimensional pairwise preference tests. Behavior Research Methods. PMID 35931936 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01927-z  0.759
2022 Joo SH, Lee P, Stark S. Bayesian Approaches for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model. Applied Psychological Measurement. 46: 98-115. PMID 35281341 DOI: 10.1177/01466216211066606  0.77
2022 Joo SH, Lee P, Stark S. The Explanatory Generalized Graded Unfolding Model: Incorporating Collateral Information to Improve the Latent Trait Estimation Accuracy. Applied Psychological Measurement. 46: 3-18. PMID 34898744 DOI: 10.1177/01466216211051717  0.778
2021 Joo SH, Lee P, Stark S. Modeling Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Item Response Theory Model. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1-21. PMID 34370564 DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1960142  0.767
2021 Wang Y, Kim E, Ferron JM, Dedrick RF, Tan TX, Stark S. Testing Measurement Invariance Across Unobserved Groups: The Role of Covariates in Factor Mixture Modeling. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 81: 61-89. PMID 33456062 DOI: 10.1177/0013164420925122  0.318
2020 Nye CD, White LA, Drasgow F, Prasad J, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S. Examining personality for the selection and classification of soldiers: Validity and differential validity across jobs. Military Psychology : the Official Journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association. 32: 60-70. PMID 38536306 DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652482  0.774
2020 Kirkendall CD, Nye CD, Rounds J, Drasgow F, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S. Adaptive vocational interest diagnostic: Informing and improving the job assignment process. Military Psychology : the Official Journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association. 32: 91-100. PMID 38536267 DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652480  0.723
2020 Kirkendall CD, Nye CD, Rounds J, Drasgow F, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S. Adaptive vocational interest diagnostic: Informing and improving the job assignment process. Military Psychology : the Official Journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association. 32: 91-100. PMID 38536267 DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652480  0.723
2020 Nye CD, White LA, Horgen K, Drasgow F, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Predictors of attitudes and performance in U.S. Army recruiters: Does personality matter? Military Psychology : the Official Journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association. 32: 81-90. PMID 38536238 DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652486  0.761
2020 Ng V, Lee P, Ho MR, Kuykendall L, Stark S, Tay L. The Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format Character Measure: Testing the Thurstonian IRT Approach. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1-14. PMID 32208939 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1739056  0.825
2020 Lee P, Joo S, Stark S. Detecting DIF in Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures Using the Thurstonian Item Response Theory Model Organizational Research Methods. 24: 739-771. DOI: 10.1177/1094428120959822  0.79
2020 Nye CD, White LA, Horgen K, Drasgow F, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Predictors of attitudes and performance in U.S. Army recruiters: Does personality matter? Military Psychology. 32: 81-90. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652486  0.757
2020 Nye CD, White LA, Drasgow F, Prasad J, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S. Examining personality for the selection and classification of soldiers: Validity and differential validity across jobs Military Psychology. 32: 60-70. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652482  0.76
2019 Joo SH, Lee P, Stark S. Adaptive testing with the GGUM-RANK multidimensional forced choice model: Comparison of pair, triplet, and tetrad scoring. Behavior Research Methods. PMID 31342469 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01274-6  0.791
2019 Lee P, Joo SH, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. GGUM-RANK Statement and Person Parameter Estimation With Multidimensional Forced Choice Triplets. Applied Psychological Measurement. 43: 226-240. PMID 31019358 DOI: 10.1177/0146621618768294  0.834
2019 Joo SH, Chun S, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Item Parameter Estimation With the General Hyperbolic Cosine Ideal Point IRT Model. Applied Psychological Measurement. 43: 18-33. PMID 30573932 DOI: 10.1177/0146621618758697  0.309
2019 Zhang B, Sun T, Drasgow F, Chernyshenko OS, Nye CD, Stark S, White LA. Though Forced, Still Valid: Psychometric Equivalence of Forced-Choice and Single-Statement Measures Organizational Research Methods. 23: 569-590. DOI: 10.1177/1094428119836486  0.772
2019 Nye CD, Joo S, Zhang B, Stark S. Advancing and Evaluating IRT Model Data Fit Indices in Organizational Research Organizational Research Methods. 23: 457-486. DOI: 10.1177/1094428119833158  0.318
2018 Joo S, Lee P, Stark S. Development of Information Functions and Indices for the GGUM-RANK Multidimensional Forced Choice IRT Model Journal of Educational Measurement. 55: 357-372. DOI: 10.1111/JEDM.12183  0.716
2018 Nye CD, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Drasgow F, Phillips HL, Phillips JB, Campbell JS. More than g : Evidence for the Incremental Validity of Performance‐Based Assessments for Predicting Training Performance Applied Psychology. 69: 302-324. DOI: 10.1111/Apps.12171  0.708
2018 Lee P, Lee S, Stark S. Examining validity evidence for multidimensional forced choice measures with different scoring approaches Personality and Individual Differences. 123: 229-235. DOI: 10.1016/J.PAID.2017.11.031  0.75
2017 Lee P, Joo SH, Stark S. Linking Methods for the Zinnes-Griggs Pairwise Preference IRT Model. Applied Psychological Measurement. 41: 130-144. PMID 29881082 DOI: 10.1177/0146621616675836  0.767
2017 Joo SH, Lee P, Stark S. Evaluating Anchor-Item Designs for Concurrent Calibration With the GGUM. Applied Psychological Measurement. 41: 83-96. PMID 29881079 DOI: 10.1177/0146621616673997  0.769
2016 Wang W, Lee P, Joo SH, Stark S, Louden R. MCMC Z-G: An IRT Computer Program for Forced-Choice Noncognitive Measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement. 40: 551-553. PMID 29881069 DOI: 10.1177/0146621616663682  0.757
2016 Chun S, Stark S, Kim ES, Chernyshenko OS. MIMIC Methods for Detecting DIF Among Multiple Groups: Exploring a New Sequential-Free Baseline Procedure. Applied Psychological Measurement. 40: 486-499. PMID 29881065 DOI: 10.1177/0146621616659738  0.66
2016 Wang W, Lee P, Joo SH, Stark S, Louden R. MCMC Z-G: An IRT Computer Program for Forced-Choice Noncognitive Measurement Applied Psychological Measurement. 40: 551-553. DOI: 10.1177/0146621616663682  0.759
2016 Kim ES, Joo SH, Lee P, Wang Y, Stark S. Measurement Invariance Testing Across Between-Level Latent Classes Using Multilevel Factor Mixture Modeling Structural Equation Modeling. 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1196108  0.743
2015 Rojas EC, Hicks BM, Stark S, Hopwood CJ, Bornovalova MA. Elaborating on the construct validity of the Minnesota Borderline Personality Disorder Scale (MBPD): a multi-sample, longitudinal examination. Psychological Assessment. 27: 332-9. PMID 25558963 DOI: 10.1037/Pas0000061  0.331
2015 Guenole N, Chernyshenko O, Stark S, Drasgow F. Are predictions based on situational judgement tests precise enough for feedback in leadership development? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 24: 433-443. DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2014.926890  0.632
2014 Woo SE, Chernyshenko OS, Stark SE, Conz G. Validity of six openness facets in predicting work behaviors: a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment. 96: 76-86. PMID 23795997 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.806329  0.655
2014 Woo SE, Chernyshenko OS, Longley A, Zhang ZX, Chiu CY, Stark SE. Openness to Experience: its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence. Journal of Personality Assessment. 96: 29-45. PMID 23795950 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.806328  0.692
2014 Lee P, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Detecting aberrant responding on unidimensional Pairwise preference tests: An application of lz based on the Zinnes–Griggs ideal point IRT model Applied Psychological Measurement. 38: 391-403. DOI: 10.1177/0146621614526636  0.813
2014 Seybert J, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Detecting DIF With Ideal Point Models: A Comparison of Area and Parameter Difference Methods Applied Psychological Measurement. 38: 151-165. DOI: 10.1177/0146621613508306  0.698
2014 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F, Nye CD, White LA, Heffner T, Farmer WL. From ABLE to TAPAS: A new generation of personality tests to support military selection and classification decisions Military Psychology. 26: 153-164. DOI: 10.1037/Mil0000044  0.788
2013 Guenole N, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Cockerill T, Drasgow F. More than a mirage: A large-scale assessment centre with more dimension variance than exercise variance Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 86: 5-21. DOI: 10.1111/J.2044-8325.2012.02063.X  0.732
2013 Cho E, Tay L, Allen TD, Stark S. Identification of a dispositional tendency to experience work-family spillover Journal of Vocational Behavior. 82: 188-198. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jvb.2013.01.006  0.569
2012 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F, White LA. Adaptive Testing With Multidimensional Pairwise Preference Items: Improving the Efficiency of Personality and Other Noncognitive Assessments Organizational Research Methods. 15: 463-487. DOI: 10.1177/1094428112444611  0.798
2012 Seybert J, Stark S. Iterative Linking With the Differential Functioning of Items and Tests (DFIT) Method Applied Psychological Measurement. 36: 494-515. DOI: 10.1177/0146621612445182  0.343
2012 Drasgow F, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S. Test Theory and Personality Measurement Oxford Handbook of Personality Assessment. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195366877.013.0004  0.754
2011 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Guenole N. Can subject matter experts' ratings of statement extremity be used to streamline the development of unidimensional pairwise preference scales? Organizational Research Methods. 14: 256-278. DOI: 10.1177/1094428109356712  0.738
2011 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F. Constructing Fake-Resistant Personality Tests Using Item Response Theory: High-Stakes Personality Testing with Multidimensional Pairwise Preferences New Perspectives On Faking in Personality Assessment. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387476.003.0061  0.786
2011 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Computerized adaptive testing with the zinnes and griggs pairwise preference ideal point model International Journal of Testing. 11: 231-247. DOI: 10.1080/15305058.2011.561459  0.712
2011 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F, Lee WC, White LA, Young MC. Optimizing prediction of attrition with the U.S.Army's assessment of individual motivation (AIM) Military Psychology. 23: 180-201. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2011.550234  0.744
2010 Drasgow F, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S. Improving the Measurement of Psychological Variables: Ideal Point Models Rock! Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 3: 515-520. DOI: 10.1111/J.1754-9434.2010.01284.X  0.783
2010 Drasgow F, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S. 75 Years After Likert: Thurstone Was Right! Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 3: 465-476. DOI: 10.1111/J.1754-9434.2010.01273.X  0.767
2009 Lopez Rivas GE, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. The effects of referent item parameters on differential item functioning detection using the free baseline likelihood ratio test Applied Psychological Measurement. 33: 251-265. DOI: 10.1177/0146621608321760  0.725
2009 Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Williams A. Latent Trait Theory Approach to Measuring Person-Organization Fit: Conceptual Rationale and Empirical Evaluation International Journal of Testing. 9: 358-380. DOI: 10.1080/15305050903351919  0.711
2009 Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Prewett MS, Gray AA, Stilson FR, Tuttle MD. Normative scoring of multidimensional pairwise preference personality scales using IRT: Empirical comparisons with other formats Human Performance. 22: 105-127. DOI: 10.1080/08959280902743303  0.751
2007 Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Drasgow F, Roberts BW. Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. Psychological Assessment. 19: 88-106. PMID 17371125 DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.1.88  0.8
2007 Crede M, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Dalal RS, Bashshur M. Job satisfaction as mediator: An assessment of job satisfaction's position within the nomological network Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 80: 515-538. DOI: 10.1348/096317906X136180  0.633
2007 Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Guenole N. Can the discretionary nature of certain criteria lead to differential prediction across cultural groups? International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 15: 175-184. DOI: 10.1111/J.1468-2389.2007.00379.X  0.649
2006 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F. Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 91: 1292-306. PMID 17100485 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1292  0.786
2006 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F, Williams BA. Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? The Journal of Applied Psychology. 91: 25-39. PMID 16435936 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.25  0.802
2006 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Multistage testing: Widely or narrowly applicable? Applied Measurement in Education. 19: 257-260. DOI: 10.1207/S15324818Ame1903_6  0.628
2005 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F. Identifying and Understanding the Effects of Unmotivated Examinees on Test Dimensionality Using Optimal Appropriateness Measurement International Journal of Testing. 5: 247-263. DOI: 10.1207/S15327574Ijt0503_4  0.764
2005 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F. An IRT approach to constructing and scoring pairwise preference items involving stimuli on different dimensions: The multi-unidimensional pairwise-preference model Applied Psychological Measurement. 29: 184-203. DOI: 10.1177/0146621604273988  0.801
2005 Roberts BW, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Goldberg LR. The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires Personnel Psychology. 58: 103-139. DOI: 10.1111/J.1744-6570.2005.00301.X  0.693
2004 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F. Examining the effects of differential item (functioning and differential) test functioning on selection decisions: when are statistically significant effects practically important? The Journal of Applied Psychology. 89: 497-508. PMID 15161408 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.497  0.784
2004 Roberts BW, Bogg T, Walton KE, Chernyshenko OS, Stark SE. A lexical investigation of the lower-order structure of conscientiousness Journal of Research in Personality. 38: 164-178. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00065-5  0.655
2002 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Lancaster AR, Drasgow F, Fitzgerald LF. Toward Standardized Measurement of Sexual Harassment: Shortening the SEQ-DoD Using Item Response Theory Military Psychology. 14: 49-72. DOI: 10.1207/S15327876Mp1401_03  0.73
2002 Stark S, Drasgow F. An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model Applied Psychological Measurement. 26: 208-227. DOI: 10.1177/01421602026002007  0.605
2001 Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Chan KY, Drasgow F, Williams B. Fitting Item Response Theory Models to Two Personality Inventories: Issues and Insights. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 36: 523-62. PMID 26822181 DOI: 10.1207/S15327906Mbr3604_03  0.791
2001 Borman WC, Buck DE, Hanson MA, Motowidlo SJ, Stark S, Drasgow F. An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 86: 965-73. PMID 11596812 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.965  0.603
2001 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Chan KY, Lee WC, Drasgow F. Effects of the testing situation on item responding: cause for concern. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 86: 943-53. PMID 11596810 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.943  0.793
2001 Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Chan KY. Investigating the hierarchical factor structure of the fifth edition of the 16PF: An application of the Schmid-Leiman orthogonalization procedure Educational and Psychological Measurement. 61: 290-302. DOI: 10.1177/00131640121971248  0.642
Show low-probability matches.