Trafton Drew - Publications

Affiliations: 
University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States 
Area:
Visual attention
Website:
http://traftondrew.googlepages.com/

75 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2023 Balaban H, Drew T, Luria R. Dissociable online integration processes in visual working memory. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991). PMID 37814362 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad378  0.389
2023 Lavelle M, Luria R, Drew T. Incidental recognition reveals attentional tradeoffs shaped by categorical similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 49: 893-906. PMID 37276126 DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001128  0.326
2020 Williams LH, Drew T. Maintaining rejected distractors in working memory during visual search depends on search stimuli: Evidence from contralateral delay activity. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. PMID 33000442 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02127-7  0.372
2020 Drew T, Guthrie J, Reback I. Worse in real life: An eye-tracking examination of the cost of CAD at low prevalence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied. PMID 32378931 DOI: 10.1037/xap0000277  0.359
2020 Fawver B, Thomas JL, Drew T, Mills MK, Auffermann WF, Lohse KR, Williams AM. Seeing isn't necessarily believing: Misleading contextual information influences perceptual-cognitive bias in radiologists. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied. PMID 32324020 DOI: 10.1037/Xap0000274  0.306
2020 Banerjee S, Drew T, Mills MK, Auffermann WF. Perceptual training: learning versus attentional shift. Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.). 7: 022407. PMID 31903409 DOI: 10.1117/1.Jmi.7.2.022407  0.342
2019 Balaban H, Drew T, Luria R. Neural evidence for an object-based pointer system underlying working memory. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior. 119: 362-372. PMID 31195317 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.05.008  0.443
2019 Brunyé TT, Drew T, Weaver DL, Elmore JG. A review of eye tracking for understanding and improving diagnostic interpretation. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 4: 7. PMID 30796618 DOI: 10.1186/S41235-019-0159-2  0.33
2019 Balaban H, Drew T, Luria R. Neural evidence for a dissociation between the pointer system and the representations of visual working memory Journal of Vision. 19. DOI: 10.1167/19.10.82C  0.409
2019 Drew T, Williams LH, Wolfe JM, Wiegand I. How do you know if you saw that? Electrophysiological correlates of searching through memory. Journal of Vision. 19: 317a. DOI: 10.1167/19.10.317a  0.35
2019 Alonso DF, Falla SY, Vaskevich A, Luria R, Drew T. Does the relationship between incidental fixations and distractor recognition depend on target consistency across visual search trials Journal of Vision. 19. DOI: 10.1167/19.10.307C  0.415
2018 Drew T, Williams LH, Jones CM, Luria R. Neural Processing of Repeated Search Targets Depends Upon the Stimuli: Real World Stimuli Engage Semantic Processing and Recognition Memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 12: 460. PMID 30519166 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00460  0.622
2018 Clement A, Stothart C, Drew T, Brockmole JR. Author accepted manuscript: Semantic associations do not modulate the visual awareness of objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 1747021818811411. PMID 30352545 DOI: 10.1177/1747021818811411  0.446
2018 Balaban H, Drew T, Luria R. Delineating resetting and updating in visual working memory based on the object-to-representation correspondence. Neuropsychologia. PMID 29605595 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.038  0.428
2018 Nicora G, Alonso D, Rand K, Creem-Regehr S, Drew T. Exploring the utility of incidental fixations in dynamic real-world visual search through mobile eye tracking Journal of Vision. 18: 650. DOI: 10.1167/18.10.650  0.358
2018 Williams L, Drew T. Are rejected distractors maintained in working memory? Evidence from the Contralateral Delay Activity Journal of Vision. 18: 526. DOI: 10.1167/18.10.526  0.355
2018 Jones C, Williams L, Drew T. Does this grab your attention? A comparison of attention and memory resources deployed during search for artificial and real world objects. Journal of Vision. 18: 521. DOI: 10.1167/18.10.521  0.488
2018 Balaban H, Drew T, Luria R. An object-based pointer system in visual working memory Journal of Vision. 18: 185. DOI: 10.1167/18.10.185  0.462
2018 Williams LH, Drew T. Working memory capacity predicts search accuracy for novel as well as repeated targets Visual Cognition. 26: 463-474. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2018.1490370  0.481
2017 Drew T, Mance I, Horowitz TS, Wolfe JM, Vogel EK. A Soft Handoff of Attention between Cerebral Hemispheres. Current Biology : Cb. 27: 3904-3905. PMID 29257955 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.076  0.559
2017 Drew T, Williams LH. Simple eye-movement feedback during visual search is not helpful. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 2: 44. PMID 29214205 DOI: 10.1186/s41235-017-0082-3  0.407
2017 Balaban H, Drew T, Luria R. Visual working memory can selectively reset a subset of its representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. PMID 29124670 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1400-y  0.351
2017 Aizenman A, Drew T, Ehinger KA, Georgian-Smith D, Wolfe JM. Comparing search patterns in digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography: an eye tracking study. Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.). 4: 045501. PMID 29098168 DOI: 10.1117/1.Jmi.4.4.045501  0.302
2017 Drew T, Boettcher SEP, Wolfe JM. One visual search, many memory searches: An eye-tracking investigation of hybrid search. Journal of Vision. 17: 5. PMID 28892812 DOI: 10.1167/17.11.5  0.463
2017 Boettcher SEP, Drew T, Wolfe JM. Lost in the supermarket: Quantifying the cost of partitioning memory sets in hybrid search. Memory & Cognition. PMID 28786022 DOI: 10.3758/S13421-017-0744-X  0.37
2017 Williams LH, Drew T. Distraction in diagnostic radiology: How is search through volumetric medical images affected by interruptions? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 2: 12. PMID 28275705 DOI: 10.1186/s41235-017-0050-y  0.335
2017 Gil Gómez de Liaño B, Drew T, Rin D, Wolfe J. Target prevalence in a visual search task differentially modulates lure effects from visual working memory Journal of Vision. 17: 73. DOI: 10.1167/17.10.73  0.45
2017 Balaban H, Drew T, Luria R. Visual working memory resetting is triggered by a loss of objects-to-representations correspondence Journal of Vision. 17: 1282. DOI: 10.1167/17.10.1282  0.456
2017 Williams L, Drew T. Electrophysiological Correlates of Individual Differences in Visual Search Journal of Vision. 17: 1140. DOI: 10.1167/17.10.1140  0.333
2017 Drew T, Reback I. Low target prevalence exacerbates problems with Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) during visual search Journal of Vision. 17: 1125. DOI: 10.1167/17.10.1125  0.362
2016 Drew T, Stohart C. Clarifying the role of target similarity, task relevance and feature-based suppression during sustained inattentional blindness. Journal of Vision. 16: 13. PMID 27973645 DOI: 10.1167/16.15.13  0.408
2016 Cunningham CA, Drew T, Wolfe JM. Analog Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) information can be more effective than binary marks. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. PMID 27928658 DOI: 10.3758/S13414-016-1250-0  0.308
2016 Wen G, Aizenman A, Drew T, Wolfe JM, Haygood TM, Markey MK. Computational assessment of visual search strategies in volumetric medical images. Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.). 3: 015501. PMID 26759815 DOI: 10.1117/1.Jmi.3.1.015501  0.322
2016 Gil-Gómez de Liaño B, Drew T, Rin D, Wolfe J. Paradoxical speeding of visual search by the inclusion of WM and LTM lures Journal of Vision. 16: 342. DOI: 10.1167/16.12.342  0.358
2015 Wolfe JM, Evans KK, Drew T, Aizenman A, Josephs E. HOW DO RADIOLOGISTS USE THE HUMAN SEARCH ENGINE? Radiation Protection Dosimetry. PMID 26656078 DOI: 10.1093/Rpd/Ncv501  0.356
2015 Wolfe J, Cain M, Ehinger K, Drew T. Guided Search 5.0: Meeting the challenge of hybrid search and multiple-target foraging. Journal of Vision. 15: 1106. PMID 26326794 DOI: 10.1167/15.12.1106  0.35
2015 Gil-Gómez de Liaño B, Drew T, Rin D, Wolfe J. Active working memory tasks interfere with inefficient search but NOT with efficient search, guided by bottom-up salience. Journal of Vision. 15: 62. PMID 26325750 DOI: 10.1167/15.12.62  0.387
2015 Wolfe JM, Boettcher SE, Josephs EL, Cunningham CA, Drew T. You Look Familiar, but I Don't Care: Lure Rejection in Hybrid Visual and Memory Search Is Not Based on Familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. PMID 26191615 DOI: 10.1037/Xhp0000096  0.46
2015 Drew T, Boettcher SE, Wolfe JM. Searching while loaded: Visual working memory does not interfere with hybrid search efficiency but hybrid search uses working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. PMID 26055755 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0874-8  0.442
2014 Drew T, Sherman A, Boettcher SE, Wolfe JM. Memory search for the first target modulates the magnitude of the attentional blink. Memory & Cognition. 42: 1333-44. PMID 24961882 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0440-z  0.406
2014 Drew T, Mance I, Horowitz TS, Wolfe JM, Vogel EK. A soft handoff of attention between cerebral hemispheres. Current Biology : Cb. 24: 1133-7. PMID 24768055 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.054  0.652
2014 Drew T, Wolfe JM. Hybrid search in the temporal domain: Evidence for rapid, serial logarithmic search through memory. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 76: 296-303. PMID 24343519 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0606-y  0.45
2014 Gil-Gomez de Liano B, Drew T, Quiros M, Wolfe J. Updating for free? Span and Updating tasks modulate Visual Search in a similar manner Journal of Vision. 14: 917-917. DOI: 10.1167/14.10.917  0.35
2013 Drew T, Võ ML, Wolfe JM. The invisible gorilla strikes again: sustained inattentional blindness in expert observers. Psychological Science. 24: 1848-53. PMID 23863753 DOI: 10.1177/0956797613479386  0.326
2013 Drew T, Horowitz TS, Vogel EK. Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking. Cognition. 126: 213-23. PMID 23141025 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.003  0.665
2013 Drew T, Evans K, Võ ML, Jacobson FL, Wolfe JM. Informatics in radiology: what can you see in a single glance and how might this guide visual search in medical images? Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 33: 263-74. PMID 23104971 DOI: 10.1148/Rg.331125023  0.362
2013 Drew T, Wolfe JM. Searching for many targets: What can eye-movements tell us about hybrid visual and memory search? Journal of Vision. 13: 531-531. DOI: 10.1167/13.9.531  0.411
2013 Boettcher S, Drew T, Sherman A, Wolfe J. Hybrid search meets the Attentional Blink: How does searching through memory influence blink magnitude? Journal of Vision. 13: 1188-1188. DOI: 10.1167/13.9.1188  0.425
2012 Drew T, Cunningham C, Wolfe JM. When and why might a computer-aided detection (CAD) system interfere with visual search? An eye-tracking study. Academic Radiology. 19: 1260-7. PMID 22958720 DOI: 10.1016/J.Acra.2012.05.013  0.372
2012 Ester EF, Drew T, Klee D, Vogel EK, Awh E. Neural measures reveal a fixed item limit in subitizing. The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society For Neuroscience. 32: 7169-77. PMID 22623661 DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1218-12.2012  0.717
2012 Drew T, Horowitz TS, Wolfe JM, Vogel EK. Neural measures of dynamic changes in attentive tracking load. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 24: 440-50. PMID 21812558 DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00107  0.679
2012 Drew T, Wolfe JM. Hybrid search in the temporal domain: Monitoring an RSVP stream for multiple targets held in memory. Journal of Vision. 12: 1276-1276. DOI: 10.1167/12.9.1276  0.377
2012 Drew T, Sherman AM, Wolfe JM. How does memory search interact with the attentional blink Perception. 41: 56-56. DOI: 10.1068/V120138  0.406
2011 Howe PD, Drew T, Pinto Y, Horowitz TS. Remapping attention in multiple object tracking. Vision Research. 51: 489-95. PMID 21236290 DOI: 10.1016/J.Visres.2011.01.001  0.453
2011 Drew T, Horowitz TS, Wolfe JM, Vogel EK. Delineating the neural signatures of tracking spatial position and working memory during attentive tracking. The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society For Neuroscience. 31: 659-68. PMID 21228175 DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1339-10.2011  0.7
2011 Cunningham C, Drew T, Wolfe JM. When and why does Computer Aided Detection (CAD) interfere with visual search F1000research. 11: 1336-1336. DOI: 10.7490/F1000Research.1400.1  0.354
2010 Umemoto A, Drew T, Ester EF, Awh E. A bilateral advantage for storage in visual working memory. Cognition. 117: 69-79. PMID 20659731 DOI: 10.1016/J.Cognition.2010.07.001  0.716
2010 McCollough A, Drew T, Vogel E. Perceptual grouping during multiple object tracking Journal of Vision. 9: 920-920. DOI: 10.1167/9.8.920  0.767
2010 Umemoto A, Drew T, Ester E, Awh E. A bilateral advantage for resolution in visual working memory Journal of Vision. 9: 592-592. DOI: 10.1167/9.8.592  0.686
2010 Drew T, Horowitz T, Wolfe J, Vogel EK. Neural measures of maintaining and updating object information Journal of Vision. 9: 172-172. DOI: 10.1167/9.8.172  0.588
2010 Drew T, Horowitz TS, Wolfe JM, Vogel EK. Online measurement of dynamic changes in tracking load Journal of Vision. 8: 499-499. DOI: 10.1167/8.6.499  0.528
2010 McCollough A, Drew T, Horowitz T, Vogel E. Probing the allocation of attention during multiple object tracking with ERPs Journal of Vision. 8: 222-222. DOI: 10.1167/8.6.222  0.788
2010 Drew T, Vogel EK. An electrophysiological measure of multiple object tracking Journal of Vision. 6: 771-771. DOI: 10.1167/6.6.771  0.63
2010 Lester BD, Drew T, Vogel EK. Electrophysiological evidence of interhemispheric resource recruitment during visual working memory Journal of Vision. 10: 708-708. DOI: 10.1167/10.7.708  0.608
2010 Drew T, Horowitz TS, Wolfe J, Vogel EK. Neural measures of interhemispheric information transfer during attentive tracking Journal of Vision. 10: 302-302. DOI: 10.1167/10.7.302  0.662
2010 Vogel E, McCollough A, Drew T, Horowitz T. Probing the distribution of attention to targets and distractors in multiple object tracking Journal of Vision. 10: 245-245. DOI: 10.1167/10.7.245  0.784
2010 Drew T, Vogel EK. Working Memory: Capacity Limitations Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. 523-531. DOI: 10.1016/B978-008045046-9.00428-9  0.529
2009 Drew T, McCollough AW, Horowitz TS, Vogel EK. Attentional enhancement during multiple-object tracking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 16: 411-7. PMID 19293115 DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.411  0.797
2008 Drew T, Vogel EK. Neural measures of individual differences in selecting and tracking multiple moving objects. The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society For Neuroscience. 28: 4183-91. PMID 18417697 DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0556-08.2008  0.676
2008 Drew TW, Vogel EK. Recently attended masks are less effective. Perception & Psychophysics. 70: 96-103. PMID 18306964 DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.1.96  0.597
2007 Drew T, Horowitz TS, Vogel EK. Neural evidence for persistent representation of tracked objects during occlusion Journal of Vision. 7: 578-578. DOI: 10.1167/7.9.578  0.621
2006 Drew TW, McCollough AW, Vogel EK. Event-related potential measures of visual working memory. Clinical Eeg and Neuroscience. 37: 286-91. PMID 17073166 DOI: 10.1177/155005940603700405  0.765
2006 Drew T, Shapiro K. Representational masking and the attentional blink Visual Cognition. 13: 513-528. DOI: 10.1080/13506280544000255  0.584
2005 Drew T, Vogel EK. Repeated masks are less effective Journal of Vision. 5: 75-75. DOI: 10.1167/5.8.75  0.51
2004 Shapiro K, Drew T. Conceptual Masking in the Attentional Blink Paradigm Journal of Vision. 4: 354-354. DOI: 10.1167/4.8.354  0.577
Show low-probability matches.